Ever-decreasing circles – firms must do more to promote the benefits of partnership to the next generation
With the notable exceptions of Donald Trump's hair and Nick Clegg's electability, most things tend to change. Where once partnership and the keys to the executive bathroom were all any aspiring lawyer wanted from life, now it's not quite so cut and dried...
May 29, 2014 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
With the notable exceptions of Donald Trump's hair and Nick Clegg's electability, most things tend to change.
Where once partnership and the keys to the executive bathroom were all any aspiring lawyer wanted from life, now it's not quite so cut and dried. Legal Week's study of 2014′s round of partner promotions may show that the number being made up has increased significantly on last year, but a quick look under the bonnet shows that the topline figures don't tell the full story.
For one, the total promotions are not a great deal more than they were in 2012, before a notable slump the following year. More significantly, the size of the firms in question has grown markedly in the last two years, meaning that more new partners should, in theory, be making the grade to replace those leaving at the other end of the career lifespan.
But with the new partners at the top 50 UK firms making up just 4% of their combined partnerships, there may not be enough young talent coming through the ranks. While it would be wrong to draw conclusions on the basis of one year's results, there is a sense that something interesting might be happening: that the golden ticket to partnership has begun to lose its lustre.
The evidence is compelling. The traditional law firm model of a tight all-equity partnership in which all members have some skin in the game and, therefore, a sense of collective responsibility, has been steadily eroding over the last generation or so. Instead, the globalisation of many top firms has spawned myriad ways to cut the partnership cloth. Kirkland & Ellis' 'up or out' model may be at the more extreme end, but there are plenty of other firms that maintain a sizeable cohort of non-equity partners, with a status barely above that of a senior associate.
Meanwhile, the recent reforms from HM Revenue & Customs – requiring firms to pay national insurance contributions for any 'partners' who could be considered employees – have further muddied the water. Some firms have responded by asking junior partners to increase contributions. Given that many 30-somethings will be looking to make partner at the same time as they start a family or move home, the prospect of making the grade becomes even less appealing.
Throw into the mix the fact that in-house teams are growing – both in size and influence – and it should be no surprise that lawyers are considering their options, even when the keys to the door are within their grasp.
For more, see Following an uncertain path – analysing 2014′s UK top 30 partner promotions.
- Does your law firm value you? Click here to provide confidential feedback in Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readEversheds Sutherland Outgoing Co-CEO to Move to Dubai to Spur Regional Growth
2 minute readKobre & Kim Hires Regional Managing Director for Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250