Ever-decreasing circles – firms must do more to promote the benefits of partnership to the next generation
With the notable exceptions of Donald Trump's hair and Nick Clegg's electability, most things tend to change. Where once partnership and the keys to the executive bathroom were all any aspiring lawyer wanted from life, now it's not quite so cut and dried...
May 29, 2014 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
With the notable exceptions of Donald Trump's hair and Nick Clegg's electability, most things tend to change.
Where once partnership and the keys to the executive bathroom were all any aspiring lawyer wanted from life, now it's not quite so cut and dried. Legal Week's study of 2014′s round of partner promotions may show that the number being made up has increased significantly on last year, but a quick look under the bonnet shows that the topline figures don't tell the full story.
For one, the total promotions are not a great deal more than they were in 2012, before a notable slump the following year. More significantly, the size of the firms in question has grown markedly in the last two years, meaning that more new partners should, in theory, be making the grade to replace those leaving at the other end of the career lifespan.
But with the new partners at the top 50 UK firms making up just 4% of their combined partnerships, there may not be enough young talent coming through the ranks. While it would be wrong to draw conclusions on the basis of one year's results, there is a sense that something interesting might be happening: that the golden ticket to partnership has begun to lose its lustre.
The evidence is compelling. The traditional law firm model of a tight all-equity partnership in which all members have some skin in the game and, therefore, a sense of collective responsibility, has been steadily eroding over the last generation or so. Instead, the globalisation of many top firms has spawned myriad ways to cut the partnership cloth. Kirkland & Ellis' 'up or out' model may be at the more extreme end, but there are plenty of other firms that maintain a sizeable cohort of non-equity partners, with a status barely above that of a senior associate.
Meanwhile, the recent reforms from HM Revenue & Customs – requiring firms to pay national insurance contributions for any 'partners' who could be considered employees – have further muddied the water. Some firms have responded by asking junior partners to increase contributions. Given that many 30-somethings will be looking to make partner at the same time as they start a family or move home, the prospect of making the grade becomes even less appealing.
Throw into the mix the fact that in-house teams are growing – both in size and influence – and it should be no surprise that lawyers are considering their options, even when the keys to the door are within their grasp.
For more, see Following an uncertain path – analysing 2014′s UK top 30 partner promotions.
- Does your law firm value you? Click here to provide confidential feedback in Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTed Olson, Legal 'Titan' and Former US Solicitor General Who Argued Bush v. Gore, Dies
Baker McKenzie, Greenberg Traurig, Clyde & Co. Expand In Middle East
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250