Simmons lining up Singapore joint venture before year-end
Simmons & Simmons is looking to launch a joint law venture (JLV) in Singapore before the end of this year as a number of international firms continue to eye similar options in the city state.
June 05, 2014 at 06:33 AM
4 minute read
Simmons & Simmons is looking to launch a joint law venture (JLV) in Singapore before the end of this year as a number of international firms continue to eye similar options in the city-state.
The UK firm opened in Singapore last June as part of a push to expand its Asia network and boost regional revenues. A JLV would allow it to advise on local law, focusing on a handful of key areas which would complement its existing international practice.
Other firms to have launched successful JLVs in the country include Watson Farley & Williams with Asia Practice, Clyde & Co and Clasis, Hogan Lovells with Lee & Lee, Pinsent Masons and MPillay, and Baker & McKenzie alongside Wong & Leow.
Those understood to be considering JLV or other local tie-up options include DLA Piper, Herbert Smith Freehills, Ashurst, Mayer Brown, Dentons, Oslwang and Berwin Leighton Paisner.
"Singapore's gone really well – [and now] we're looking at a JLV," said Asia managing partner Paul Li.
He added that the firm would look to launch with four partners before the end of the year.
"We're concentrating on certain areas, looking at the Simmons brand and where we can make a difference," he continued. "[For example], employment is an interesting market because it's a developing area and increasingly important [to clients]. And apart from our strong brand in that area, having looked at the market, there is no specialist employment practice. There are a couple of people who do it but it's more corporate support. So that's very attractive to us.
"[Another area] is dispute resolution. Increasingly there is investigations work, which international law firms are allowed to do, and that is what we would focus on."
He added that the firm was looking specifically at the JLV model due to administrative complexities surrounding the alternative Formal Law Alliance or FLA, which was the chosen model for a partnership between Clifford Chance and Cavenagh Law in December 2012, and has since attracted an increasing amount of market interest.
Stephenson Harwood established an FLA with Virtus Law most recently, while those listed above are also thought to be considering the model.
Simmons currently has five partners on the ground in Singapore, with core practice areas include TMT, corporate, banking and projects, in addition to energy, infrastructure and oil and gas-related work.
Unlike Hong Kong, Singapore continues to restrict the activities of international law firms by barring them from practising local law without a Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licence or local tie-up, and prohibiting them from offering litigation advice unless through an FLA and handled by the local partner firm.
Earlier this year, Herbert Smith Freehills' did not have its QFLP renewed, while White & Case was granted a one-year conditional local licence subject to it meeting certain unspecified criteria.
There are now just nine firms with a QFLP, seven with JLVs and four with FLAs – despite rising numbers of firms entering the country.
Prior to Simmons' opening, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Morrison Foerster also relaunched offices in the city, while those currently looking at bases on the ground include Paul Hastings, Winston & Strawn and King & Wood Mallesons.
Related: Singapore fling – the international firms eager to secure alliances in the city-state
- Does your law firm value you? Click here to provide confidential feedback in Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Cleary Gottlieb Act on $700M Dunlop Tire Brand Sale to Japan's Sumitomo
Stewarts and DAC Beachcroft Lead on £2B Leicester City Helicopter Crash Litigation
Trending Stories
- 16-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 2'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
- 3Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
- 4The Power of Student Prior Knowledge in Legal Education
- 5Chicago Cubs' IP Claim to Continue Against Wrigley View Rooftop, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250