Magic circle salary hikes reflect return to boom times but US threat remains
As the post-recession associate lateral market in the City seems to be heating up, competition for the best young legal talent is growing.
June 12, 2014 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
As the post-recession associate lateral market in the City seems to be heating up, competition for the best young legal talent is growing. And this is duly reflected in this year's associate pay figures.
Magic circle salaries have gone up across the board, with Clifford Chance upping pay by as much as 7.4%. Allen & Overy and Linklaters, meanwhile, have increased some salaries by 5%.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer also substantially hiked pay for its junior lawyers, topping the charts with salaries of up to £135,000 for associates in its top band – equivalent to roughly six years' experience. However, the firm moved away from the traditional associate lockstep in 2012, rendering a direct comparison with its competitors impossible.
Although Slaughter and May revealed more modest pay rises, the trend among London's legal elite suggests a return to the pre-crisis days, when annual increases were a matter of course. It also hints at a strong set of financial results from the top firms.
According to Freshfields head of graduate recruitment Elizabeth Cope, the increased rates are viewed as an investment and are not a "knee-jerk reaction" to the salaries paid by the firm's competitors.
Slaughters graduate recruitment partner Robert Byk says that, as the market for lateral hires has opened up, "a salary increase is one of the tactics to ensure the brightest and the best within firms do not go elsewhere". As Byk acknowledges, competition for talent – from US firms in particular – has never been fiercer. Most New York firms pay their London-based associates far more than their domestic rivals, with salaries converted directly from those paid on the other side of the Atlantic.
Even firms such as White & Case and Shearman & Sterling, which benchmark City rates closer to the magic circle, are at an advantage.
A source at White & Case said that its pay tends to be around 25%-30% higher than at magic circle firms. Shearman's rates mirror this assertion with associates with three and a half years' PQE earning up to £114,000, a 5% uplift on 2013-14. Byk accepts that it would be "silly not to keep an eye on" what US firms were doing, but adds that topline salaries are just one of several considerations.
Bingham McCutchen London managing partner James Roome, whose firm shook the market in 2010 when it became the first to offer £100,000 salaries for NQs, agrees that pay is not the only factor for lawyers, with "firm culture, practice areas and client contact" also vital.
"US firms have always looked to attract the best from the UK talent pool," adds Roome.
As one recruitment professional tells Legal Week, "the cat is out of the bag" on the myth that associates at the lesser-paying UK firms are able to sustain a better work-life balance than their better paid US contemporaries. Associates moving to American firms often realise they are getting better pay for the same workload.
Growth and prospects may also be better at some US outfits. "The story of American firms in London at the moment is much more interesting than just the money," claims Freddie Lawson, an associate director at Fox Rodney Search. This sentiment is felt elsewhere, with one managing partner commenting that "US firms are the ones to watch in the next few years".
This year's rises in associate pay could well mean the start of a new salary arms race, with the magic circle firms keen to assert their positions at the top. But they should be wary; US firms are fiercely expanding their London offices and, with legal recruitment as competitive as ever, higher salaries and a globally recognised name may be the key to enticing the next generation of star partners.
Freshfields: * Foundation level categorised as NQ/one-year PQE, ** Level 1 – roughly equivalent to two to four years' PQE, *** Level 2 – roughly equivalent to four years' plus PQE
- Click here for all the latest news on law firm pay and bonuses
- How highly are you valued by your law firm? Click here to take part in Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250