Dentons UKMEA profit per equity partner grew 23% in 2013-14
The debate ignited by Dentons over its decision to stop reporting PEP has taken a further twist, after figures seen by Legal Week show PEP in the firm's UKMEA region increased by almost a quarter in 2013-14.
June 22, 2014 at 07:08 PM
3 minute read
The debate ignited by Dentons over its decision to stop publically reporting profit per equity partner (PEP) and profit figures has taken a further twist, after figures seen by Legal Week show PEP in the firm's UKMEA region increased by almost a quarter in 2013-14.
Financial results circulated internally to members of the firm's UK, Middle East and Africa limited liability partnership (LLP) show PEP grew to £407,000 last year, 2% ahead of budget, and 23% up on 2012-13.
Elsewhere, revenue stood at £146m, a 3% increase against like-for-like figures for 2012-13, while net profit reached £28.7m, internally reported as being 16% up on last year's figures.
According to its internal benchmark, revenue was 1% ahead of budget, while profit was on budget, capping off a strong year of performance for the LLP, under the leadership of UKMEA chief executive Matthew Jones (pictured).
Dentons declined to comment on the 2013-14 figures.
The rises in revenue and profit are slightly higher than those calculated against a 2012-13 LLP filing with Companies' House, though this is understood to be due to accounting changes in a like-for-like comparison of the UKMEA LLP between the two years.
The disclosure follows a decision by senior firm management, first reported by Legal Week this month, to stop publically reporting average PEP figures for the firm, as well as each of Dentons' verein-structured LLPs.
Chief executive Elliott Portnoy and chairman Joe Andrew wrote a letter to the American Lawyer, citing the metric as "meaningless" for a global firm, and claiming it could be potentially damaging to client relations.
The lawyers argued that average global PEP figures say "nothing about the success of a firm"; that partners often object to voluntary public disclosure; that the reporting can lead to client dissatisfaction; and finally they argue that "a focus on profit undermines the differences between the practice of law being a profession rather than solely a business".
Dentons opened the way for its rivals to join it in shunning one of the traditional metrics by which law firm performance is judged. In issuing the statement, Portnoy and Andrew added: "We invite other firms to join us."
According to the American Lawyer, average PEP across the firm stood at $625,000 (£369,000) in 2013. Earlier this year, before it took the decision to halt reporting, Dentons said its US LLP had grown its revenue to $473m (£286m), with US PEP up by 4.8% to $958,000 (£570,000).
Last year, self-reported figures calculated by combining the respective financial performances of each part of the Swiss verein-structured firm, showed a PEP figure of £452,000 and net earnings of £225.2m.
For more, see: Dentons vs the legal press: partners react to PEP row
• Which law firms do you most admire? Click here to respond to Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTribunal Dismisses AML Case Against Kennedys’ Chief Risk Officer, But Ex-Partner Fined
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
2 minute readDLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250