Quinn Emanuel and Samsung fined over $2m for leaking Apple and Nokia deal terms
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and client Samsung has been ordered to pay over $2m (£1.2m) in legal fees and costs to Apple and Nokia for breaking a court order protecting a confidential patent licensing agreement.
June 24, 2014 at 09:27 AM
2 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and its client Samsung have been ordered to pay over $2m (£1.2m) in legal fees and costs to Apple and Nokia for breaking a court order protecting a confidential patent licensing agreement.
A US court has ruled that Samsung and Quinn Emanuel are to pay Nokia around $1.15m (£677,000) and nearly $894,000 (£526,000) to Apple, for costs incurred in litigating Apple's motion for sanctions against the pair and the discovery associated with it.
The order was handed down by California judge Paul Grewal on Friday (20 June).
An investigation last year found that terms of an agreement between Apple and Nokia were leaked by lawyers at Quinn Emanuel, who had been given access to confidential Apple documents marked "for attorney eyes' only".
The document found its way to Quinn lawyers during the discovery stage of an iPhone infringement litigation, according to Northern District of California court filings.
A report containing key information from the documents, created by expert witness David Teece for Quinn Emanuel, was not fully redacted and was sent to over fifty Samsung employees, including senior licensing executives, and various counsel representing Samsung in overseas jurisdictions.
Quinn Emanuel had challenged Apple's motion for sanctions, urging the court to "substantially reduce Apple's and Nokia's requested fee requests".
The firm's argument – that Apple had not redacted the terms of its licence with Nokia from a document filed on the public docket last October – was rejected by the court.
Quinn Emanuel also argued that the fees should be reduced to reflect Apple's and Nokia's "limited success" on many claims, which the judge ruled was "simply incorrect".
The protracted global patent battle between Apple and Samsung has handed roles to several law firms including Morrison & Foerster and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr for Apple. For the Quinn dispute, Nokia has instructed Alston & Bird.
Outside of the US, firms that have landed roles include Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Simmons & Simmons, both of which advised on litigation that saw Apple on its unsuccessful design infringement claim against Samsung in 2012.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readWeil Acquires More Office Space as HSF, Simmons Eye New London Bases
2 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Trending Stories
- 1From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Rollercoaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 2Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 3Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 4Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 5Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250