Quinn Emanuel and Samsung fined over $2m for leaking Apple and Nokia deal terms
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and client Samsung has been ordered to pay over $2m (£1.2m) in legal fees and costs to Apple and Nokia for breaking a court order protecting a confidential patent licensing agreement.
June 24, 2014 at 09:27 AM
2 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and its client Samsung have been ordered to pay over $2m (£1.2m) in legal fees and costs to Apple and Nokia for breaking a court order protecting a confidential patent licensing agreement.
A US court has ruled that Samsung and Quinn Emanuel are to pay Nokia around $1.15m (£677,000) and nearly $894,000 (£526,000) to Apple, for costs incurred in litigating Apple's motion for sanctions against the pair and the discovery associated with it.
The order was handed down by California judge Paul Grewal on Friday (20 June).
An investigation last year found that terms of an agreement between Apple and Nokia were leaked by lawyers at Quinn Emanuel, who had been given access to confidential Apple documents marked "for attorney eyes' only".
The document found its way to Quinn lawyers during the discovery stage of an iPhone infringement litigation, according to Northern District of California court filings.
A report containing key information from the documents, created by expert witness David Teece for Quinn Emanuel, was not fully redacted and was sent to over fifty Samsung employees, including senior licensing executives, and various counsel representing Samsung in overseas jurisdictions.
Quinn Emanuel had challenged Apple's motion for sanctions, urging the court to "substantially reduce Apple's and Nokia's requested fee requests".
The firm's argument – that Apple had not redacted the terms of its licence with Nokia from a document filed on the public docket last October – was rejected by the court.
Quinn Emanuel also argued that the fees should be reduced to reflect Apple's and Nokia's "limited success" on many claims, which the judge ruled was "simply incorrect".
The protracted global patent battle between Apple and Samsung has handed roles to several law firms including Morrison & Foerster and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr for Apple. For the Quinn dispute, Nokia has instructed Alston & Bird.
Outside of the US, firms that have landed roles include Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Simmons & Simmons, both of which advised on litigation that saw Apple on its unsuccessful design infringement claim against Samsung in 2012.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Boosts Private Equity Offering With Second Partner Hire This Week
2 minute readMalaysia’s Shearn Delamore Set To Expand Local Footprint With New Office Launch
Trending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250