Legal Week launches diversity accreditation for law firms with the most satisfied fee earners
Legal Week has teamed up with the Social Mobility Foundation to recognise those law firms whose fee earners are most satisfied with diversity levels at their firms.
June 26, 2014 at 09:09 AM
3 minute read
Legal Week has teamed up with the Social Mobility Foundation to recognise those law firms whose fee earners are most satisfied with diversity levels at their firms.
The Best Diversity Employer accreditation will be based on responses to Legal Week's annual Employee Satisfaction Report (ESR), which is published by its research arm, Legal Week Intelligence. Four leading law firm for diversity badges will also be awarded.
The best performing firm will also receive a special award at the British Legal Awards, which takes place in November.
The ESR, which is now in its 11th year, measures satisfaction levels among fee earners at the UK's leading commercial law firms across a range of criteria.
Last year, for the first time, the report asked fee earners to rate their satisfaction with socio-economic diversity at their firms and this year the question has been extended to cover gender and ethnic diversity.
These responses will form the core of the new accreditation, although other elements of the survey will also be taken into account, including perception of whether promotion opportunities are open to all fee earners as well as overall satisfaction levels among female, state educated and ethnic minority respondents.
The research has also been endorsed by the City of London Law Society.
David Hobart, chief executive of the CLLS, said: "A number of member firms are active supporters of the Social Mobility Foundation and its successful programme Lawyers in Schools. The CLLS hopes that this employment survey will shed light on the ability of City law firms to attract the best and brightest from all socio-economic backgrounds."
Last year, Shoosmiths received the best diversity satisfaction score, with Baker & McKenzie in second place and Mishcon de Reya in third.
At Shoosmiths, fee earners gave the level of diversity at their firm a score of 8.6 out of 10, with 10 being the most favourable score possible.
The average satisfaction score for diversity for all 51 firms surveyed was 6.8 out of 10.
The move comes as commercial law firms are coming under growing pressure to publish diversity statistics and policies.
Earlier this month Linklaters became the first magic circle firm to adopt gender diversity targets.The firm is aiming for 30% female membership of its executive committee and international board by 2018.
The target would represent a doubling of female representation on the board, which currently stands at 15%. The firm has also set a target for partner promotions, with the intention of women make up 30% of new partners effective from next year's round.
In recent years, diversity targets have also been announced by Ashurst, which is aiming to fill a quarter of its management positions with women, Pinsent Masons, which has set a goal of 25% female partners by May 2018, and Herbert Smith Freehills, which announced a 30% target for female partners in March.
The research for this year's Employee Satisfaction Report is currently in the field and will close on 4 July. For every completed survey, Legal Week Intelligence will donate £1 to the Social Mobility Foundation, which aims to improve the professional prospects of young people from low-income backgrounds.
For more information about firm-wide participation in the survey, email [email protected] or call her on +44 0207 316 9864.
To complete the survey click here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All“I Bought a £20 Suit From eBay”: How a Social Mobility Scheme Helped Launch a Paul Weiss Associate’s Career
6 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250