Legal Week launches diversity accreditation for law firms with the most satisfied fee earners
Legal Week has teamed up with the Social Mobility Foundation to recognise those law firms whose fee earners are most satisfied with diversity levels at their firms.
June 26, 2014 at 09:09 AM
3 minute read
Legal Week has teamed up with the Social Mobility Foundation to recognise those law firms whose fee earners are most satisfied with diversity levels at their firms.
The Best Diversity Employer accreditation will be based on responses to Legal Week's annual Employee Satisfaction Report (ESR), which is published by its research arm, Legal Week Intelligence. Four leading law firm for diversity badges will also be awarded.
The best performing firm will also receive a special award at the British Legal Awards, which takes place in November.
The ESR, which is now in its 11th year, measures satisfaction levels among fee earners at the UK's leading commercial law firms across a range of criteria.
Last year, for the first time, the report asked fee earners to rate their satisfaction with socio-economic diversity at their firms and this year the question has been extended to cover gender and ethnic diversity.
These responses will form the core of the new accreditation, although other elements of the survey will also be taken into account, including perception of whether promotion opportunities are open to all fee earners as well as overall satisfaction levels among female, state educated and ethnic minority respondents.
The research has also been endorsed by the City of London Law Society.
David Hobart, chief executive of the CLLS, said: "A number of member firms are active supporters of the Social Mobility Foundation and its successful programme Lawyers in Schools. The CLLS hopes that this employment survey will shed light on the ability of City law firms to attract the best and brightest from all socio-economic backgrounds."
Last year, Shoosmiths received the best diversity satisfaction score, with Baker & McKenzie in second place and Mishcon de Reya in third.
At Shoosmiths, fee earners gave the level of diversity at their firm a score of 8.6 out of 10, with 10 being the most favourable score possible.
The average satisfaction score for diversity for all 51 firms surveyed was 6.8 out of 10.
The move comes as commercial law firms are coming under growing pressure to publish diversity statistics and policies.
Earlier this month Linklaters became the first magic circle firm to adopt gender diversity targets.The firm is aiming for 30% female membership of its executive committee and international board by 2018.
The target would represent a doubling of female representation on the board, which currently stands at 15%. The firm has also set a target for partner promotions, with the intention of women make up 30% of new partners effective from next year's round.
In recent years, diversity targets have also been announced by Ashurst, which is aiming to fill a quarter of its management positions with women, Pinsent Masons, which has set a goal of 25% female partners by May 2018, and Herbert Smith Freehills, which announced a 30% target for female partners in March.
The research for this year's Employee Satisfaction Report is currently in the field and will close on 4 July. For every completed survey, Legal Week Intelligence will donate £1 to the Social Mobility Foundation, which aims to improve the professional prospects of young people from low-income backgrounds.
For more information about firm-wide participation in the survey, email [email protected] or call her on +44 0207 316 9864.
To complete the survey click here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 2De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 3Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 4Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 5Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250