Sullivan & Cromwell acts for BNP Paribas for record $9bn sanctions fine
Sullivan & Cromwell has acted as counsel for BNP Paribas as the bank agreed to pay a record $9bn (£5.1bn) settlement for breaching US trade sanctions.
July 01, 2014 at 05:49 AM
2 minute read
Sullivan & Cromwell has acted as counsel for BNP Paribas as the bank agreed to pay a record $9bn (£5.1bn) settlement for breaching US trade sanctions.
The French bank yesterday (30 June) pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy and making false statements relating to transactions on behalf of Sudan, Iran and Cuba, which amounted to billions of dollars over a ten year period between 2002 and 2012.
The settlement is the largest sanctions violation pay out in history. The biggest previous penalty paid by a bank for violating US sanctions was HSBC's $1.9bn (£1.1bn) settlement in 2012 relating to transactions with Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya and Sudan.
For the ongoing investigation and settlement, BNP turned to Sullivan & Cromwell's Karen Patton Seymour, co-managing partner of the firm's litigation group.
Earlier this month, Bloomberg reported that fellow New York elite firm Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz had also been instructed by BNP, though the firm was not named in final settlement documents.
Lead prosecutors were US attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara, assistant attorney general Leslie Caldwell and Jaikumar Ramaswamy, the Department of Justice's (DoJ) asset forfeiture and money section chief.
Altogether, BNP had to settle with the DoJ, the New York Southern District Court, the New York County District Attorney's Office, the US Federal Reserve, the New York State Department of Financial Services, and the US Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).
Bharara was also instrumental in bringing action against JP Morgan which resulted in the bank paying $2bn earlier this year to settle charges it overlooked warning signs of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme.
Sullivan & Cromwell is also acting as advisors for Barclays in relation to accusations the bank, amongst several others, including BNP, has been involved in rigging rates in the foreign exchange market.
BNP are taking advice from Allen & Overy (A&O) in relation to the forex probe.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Cleary Gottlieb Act on $700M Dunlop Tire Brand Sale to Japan's Sumitomo
Stewarts and DAC Beachcroft Lead on £2B Leicester City Helicopter Crash Litigation
Israel's Rushed Corporate Tax May Spark Law Firm Mergers, Boost Large Firms Including Gornitzky
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250