Freshfields, Skadden, Kirkland lead M&A pack at half-year point amid strong deal recovery
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has dominated the European and UK M&A rankings by deal value and volume for the first half of 2014, amid a 56% year-on-year uptick in global deal-making.
July 03, 2014 at 01:08 PM
4 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has dominated the European and UK M&A rankings by deal value and volume for the first half of 2014, amid a 56% year-on-year uptick in global deal-making.
Figures from Legal Week's exclusive data provider, Mergermarket, show that Freshfields advised on 96 deals in Europe worth $239bn (£139bn) over the six-month period, including Medtronic's $45.9bn (£26.8bn) proposed takeover of Covidien.
In the UK the firm landed roles on 45 deals worth $73.3bn (£42.7bn), including the $14.5bn (£8.5bn) joint venture between pharma giants Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline. It placed second behind Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in the global deal value rankings. Skadden advised on 99 deals worth $331.4bn (£193bn).
Kirkland & Ellis took the number one spot by global deal volume after acting on 163 deals worth $111.5bn (£65bn).
Globally, M&A value for the first half of this year has grown to $1,571.2bn (£915bn), a 56% increase on the same point last year.
The surge in M&A value contrasts with scepticism from deal-makers that a robust revival could be on the cards this time last year. Boardroom confidence has clearly intensified in several sectors, particularly healthcare, and value would have been even higher if talks between Pfizer and AstraZeneca had not collapsed.
However, corporate lawyers have shown a restrained attitude to suggestions of a return to activity levels seen in the boom years preceding the recession.
"M&A activity picked up in the last quarter of 2013, even though the market figures for 2013 as a whole remained pretty depressed, and that continued into the first half of 2014," says Slaughter and May corporate partner Andrew Jolly. "I would say it is measured, rather than unsustainably hectic or excitable, and so I am cautiously optimistic that the next half of the year will continue to see M&A pick up."
Slaughters was one of the high-climbers in the UK value rankings after acting on 21 deals worth $30.7bn (£17.9bn), sitting behind Freshfields, Linklaters and Skadden, which occupy the top three places.
At $945.2bn (£550.4bn), the second quarter of 2014 globally was the highest in deal value since Q2 2007, when levels hit $1,277bn (£744bn), and up on $626bn (£365bn) in Q1 2014.
M&A has made a strong comeback in Europe, with deals worth $453.6bn (£264bn) in the highest-valued half-year since H2 2008, which recorded a value of $504.5bn (£294bn).
In the US H1 value stood at $694.6bn (£404.5bn), up 98.3% on the first half of 2013, while Asia-Pacific reached the highest value levels on Mergermarket record with deals worth $286.7bn (£167bn).
Meanwhile, the value of cross-border deals between regions during the first six months of the year was up 82% on 2013, worth $371.5bn (£216.5bn).
In particular, the value of Europe's inbound deals for Q2 increased by 103.8% to $95.8bn (£55.8bn), while France and the UK each logged just over a quarter of inbound deals on the continent in H1.
"The big factor characterising global M&A in 2014 is politics," comments Jones Day European M&A partner Ferdinand Mason, who says deals are becoming more complex and resource-intensive for firms and their clients. "A political roadmap is now part of any major transaction."
On the whole, lawyers are predicting that the uptick will continue into the second half, although the potency of the upsurge in activity in recent months may prove short-lived.
"After a very busy start to 2014, I think the pace of activity has checked a little recently – market volatility in certain sectors and investor fatigue are among the reasons given," says Davis Polk & Wardwell corporate partner Simon Witty (pictured right). "That said, people remain optimistic about activity levels in the fourth quarter."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250