PEP at UK arm of CMS jumps 20% on back of 'more aggressive' cost management
Profit per equity partner (PEP) at CMS (UK) jumped more than 20% during the 2013-14 financial year despite a decline in revenue at the firm.
July 09, 2014 at 06:25 AM
2 minute read
Profit per equity partner (PEP) at CMS (UK) jumped more than 20% during the 2013-14 financial year despite a decline in revenue at the firm.
Average PEP for the UK arm of CMS now stands at £749,473, up from £618,270 the previous year, with the equity ladder bottoming out at £284,846 and peaking at £812,110.. Net profit was up 11% from £42.8m to £47.5m.
The profit hike came about despite a 1.7% drop in fee income, which fell from £162.2m to £159.3m. CMS managing partner Duncan Weston put the firm's improved profitability down to "more aggressive" cost management, aided in part by the continuing outsourcing of its back office functions.
"It's true we had a fairly flat year in terms of revenue," Weston (pictured) told Legal Week. "There's nothing exciting there. But we have managed to be a bit more aggressive over the last few years in terms of how we've managed the business and managed the costs, and that's started to come through in the results."
By practice area, the largest revenue generator for CMS was corporate, accounting for just over €84m (£66.7m) of turnover, followed by disputes, which brought in €65.7m (£52.2m).
"Corporate is a very strong performer for us, but all of our groups have done well," added Weston. "We have a few partner movements year on year and performance remains strong."
CMS made four lateral hires in the UK last financial year, and 13 across the Europe, Middle East and Africa. It also opened offices in Istanbul, Mexico City and Muscat.
In total, the number of full equity partners in CMS' UK LLP decreased from 71 as of May 2013, to 65 as of May 2014.
The reported numbers do not include revenues from Scottish firm Dundas & Wilson, whose merger with CMS went live on 1 May this year.
"We have already integrated all our offices and computer systems," commented Weston. "Today, you would not notice that the Dundas guys were from a different place nowadays. You wouldn't even recognise that we were two firms and the integration has been very fast and efficient."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Cleary Gottlieb Act on $700M Dunlop Tire Brand Sale to Japan's Sumitomo
Stewarts and DAC Beachcroft Lead on £2B Leicester City Helicopter Crash Litigation
Israel's Rushed Corporate Tax May Spark Law Firm Mergers, Boost Large Firms Including Gornitzky
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250