Dealmaker: Gibson Dunn's Philip Rocher on winning first Lloyd's names case
The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher litigation partner on winning the first Lloyd's names case, sleeping barristers and an underused Leeds United scarf
July 17, 2014 at 05:23 AM
4 minute read
The Gibson Dunn & Crutcher litigation partner on winning the first Lloyd's names case, sleeping barristers and an underused Leeds United scarf
Why did you become a litigator?
In my days as an articled clerk, property law involved colouring plans and corporate law involved filling in forms. Litigation seemed a much more exciting option.
What's the closest you have come to doing something other than law?
During university holidays I worked as a painter and decorator in my home town of Harrogate. I genuinely enjoyed it, but I have always been pretty single-minded about being a lawyer, which is probably a relief for the good homeowners of Harrogate.
Which judge or barrister do you most admire and why?
Geoffrey Vos, now Lord Justice Vos. Before he went to the bench he and I did a good number of cases together, starting small and, as time went on, getting more grand. His combination of intellect, hard work, judgement, advocacy skill and a sense of humour was unique, although I made a point of never telling him I thought that.
What's been your proudest professional moment/moment in court?
When I was a young partner I led a team (with Geoffrey Vos) that represented the Gooda Walker names. It was the first of the Lloyd's names cases to get to trial. After a couple of years of extremely hard work under an intense media spotlight, contrary to many 'expert' predictions, we won. The day Phillips J (as he then was) handed down the judgment was a good one, although I admit I was already worrying about what I was going to do next.
… and worst day on the job?
Inevitably I have also had one or two dark days – I am not very fond of losing.
What's the best/worst thing about being a litigator?
The glib, but true, answer is the best thing is winning and the worst thing is losing.
What's the funniest thing you've ever witnessed in court?
During a long trial there was a lot of pressure on the other side's QC. On one day in court the strain and long hours took their toll and he had obviously fallen asleep. He slipped sideways off his chair and onto the floor in a flurry of files and papers. I won't forget his face when he scrambled to his feet, with his wig perched at the very back of his head, and proclaimed that his chair must have broken.
How do litigators differ from deal lawyers?
We litigators know we will be disagreeing with the lawyers on the other side, and our aim is to establish that our client's position is correct. Deal lawyers are constantly trying to agree with each other, which must be very tiresome.
How much do you conform to the spiky litigator stereotype?
Not much. Although litigation is a competitive process, I much prefer to get on with the lawyers and business people on the other side. Having said that I do have a temper, which occasionally comes to the fore.
What most annoys you about the legal profession?
How could anything be annoying in a profession full of such kind-hearted, clever and principled people?
Do you see yourself having a career outside law?
If I am offered the manager's job at Leeds United I might take it.
What's your favourite item of clothing?
There are two. My golf glove and my Leeds United scarf. In fact I suspect I have worn my Leeds tie more than the scarf this season, which probably says something about the stage of lifeI have reached.
What's your favourite cheese?
Wensleydale.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Macfarlanes Act as Evelyn Partners Offloads £700M Professional Services Arm
2 minute readElon Musk Taps UK Top 50 Firm for London Launch of AI Business
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250