A call to alms: international firms are uniquely placed to lead major pro bono projects
Earlier this month I returned from Bangladesh, where I visited the UNICEF-funded child justice projects DLA Piper is supporting to help protect some of the country's most vulnerable children.
July 22, 2014 at 07:18 PM
3 minute read
DLA Piper's Tony Angel on why international law firms have huge responsibilities when it comes to pro bono work
Earlier this month I returned from Bangladesh, where I visited the UNICEF-funded child justice projects DLA Piper is supporting to help protect some of the country's most vulnerable children.
As part of a three-year partnership, we are providing the UK Committee for UNICEF with pro bono assistance to the value of $5m (£2.9m) and have pledged to raise a further $1.5m (£873k) for child protection programmes.
The Bangladesh government, with UNICEF's support, has made real progress to improve children's lives by reducing mortality rates, achieving high levels of immunisation and improving girls' access to education. However, it now faces problems that are far more complex and intractable like child labour and child marriage. High levels of extreme poverty continue to push many children onto the streets, where they often get caught up in an inadequate and inappropriate justice system.
With more than 65 million children in Bangladesh, the scale of these challenges is enormous. The projects we are supporting are helping to put in place the legal, social and organisational frameworks that will better protect these children. I saw first-hand what currently happens when children come into contact with the justice system, and frankly it is grim. Despite this, the children I met were remarkable; positive and full of hope despite the hurdles they have had to overcome and the challenges they still face.
The slums of Jessore may be a world away from the City, but through our pro bono and corporate responsibility programmes, DLA Piper recognises that our outlook must go beyond commercial self-interest to our wider responsibilities to society and, as a global firm, beyond national boundaries.
In Bangladesh lawyers from the firm have been working with government officials and UNICEF staff to help draft the rules supporting the implementation of the country's 2013 Children Act, which provides for positive intervention and rehabilitation. The programmes UNICEF is piloting in support of this have huge potential to transform lives, one child at a time.
International law firms' resources mean they are uniquely positioned for large-scale pro bono projects such as drafting amendments to legislation. Firms are also independent of any political agenda or mandate and partnering with organisations like the UK Committee for UNICEF ensures expert knowledge of the jurisdiction.
In order for time-poor lawyers to undertake pro bono work their employers must proactively provide opportunities and allow fee earners to count this work towards their billable targets. Structures need to be put in place by senior management to ensure that a sustainable level of pro bono work can still be undertaken despite the billing pressures on our lawyers. This includes the employment of full-time pro bono lawyers to assist in the sourcing and management of the work, and policies that ensure lawyers' pro bono efforts receive the same credit as billable work.
Throughout this, the role of law firm leaders in supporting an institutional commitment to pro bono is crucial. I would urge all firms to seek out and take advantage of any opportunity to help tackle injustice.
Tony Angel is global co-chairman of DLA Piper and senior partner of the international LLP.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan AI Beat the Billable Hour? Legal Tech Firms Say Selling AI Products to Law Firms Still a Challenge
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250