Russia under sanctions: no longer business as usual
These are dark days for businesses - and their lawyers - who have been working for many years to develop trade and investment flows between Russia and other countries, as Morgan Lewis Moscow chief Brian Zimbler reports
August 01, 2014 at 06:16 AM
3 minute read
These are dark days for businesses – and their lawyers – who have been working for many years to develop trade and investment flows between Russia and other countries, as Morgan Lewis Moscow chief Brian Zimbler reports
The EU and US have imposed tougher new sanctions against Russia, in connection with the ongoing conflict and tragic violence in Ukraine. The shocking loss of a civilian passenger jet over eastern Ukraine has rattled Western governments and prompted closer coordination among them. In response, Russian authorities remain defiant. Sadly, there seem to be few prospects for swift resolution of the crisis.
The EU and US sanctions programmes began in early March, and expanded after Russia annexed Crimea. Initially, visa bans and asset freezes were directed at political and military figures, although the lists of sanctioned persons and entities have grown over time. Other countries adopted similar programmes, including Australia, Canada, Iceland, Japan and Switzerland. These early measures did not have a substantial economic impact, however.
Now the stakes have been raised. Currently, the US "sectoral sanctions" ban US persons from involvement with new debt or new equity financing for five Russian financial institutions, and new debt for two Russian energy majors. Only debt with maturity over 90 days is affected, and certain derivative transactions are exempt. The US has also tightened licensing rules for exports to Russia.
Meanwhile, the EU has adopted its own sectoral sanctions, overcoming significant internal divisions among its 28 members. Prohibited transactions include dealing in new bonds, equity or similar financial instruments (with maturity over 90 days; loans are exempt) issued by five Russian state-owned banks or their non-EU subsidiaries; certain sales of goods or technology with military applications, or to the Russian military; and certain sales of energy-related technology or services, subject to licensing approval (with a full ban for deep water, Arctic and shale oil projects). These rules seek to balance two key goals: pressuring Russia, and minimizing impacts on EU businesses.
Russia's response
So far, the response of the Russian authorities has been limited to visa bans for certain foreign officials, combined with strong denunciations of the EU and US sanctions. Of course, there is a risk of further actions by Russia, including steps directed at foreign companies. One recent proposal would require state-owned companies to purchase only Russian-origin software; another would ban all foreign audit, consulting and legal firms connected with "aggressor states." Some Russian officials have acknowledged that it would not be productive to adopt such measures at present, when international ties are already deeply frayed.
These are dark days for businesses – and their lawyers – who have been working for many years to develop trade and investment flows between Russia and other countries. Some observers compare the current situation with the shooting-down of Korean Air 007 in 1983, which resulted in a tense standoff between the US and the USSR. Both occasions were connected with tragic loss of life, and international divisions that took years to repair. Circumstances today may be very different from the Cold War era, but the need for peace is equally great.
Brian Zimbler is managing partner in the Moscow office of Morgan Lewis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250