Sidley Austin defends client in High Court case against Standard Bank
Sidley Austin has successfully acted for the national railway company of Mongolia in a $55m (£33m) High Court battle against Standard Bank.
August 04, 2014 at 07:08 PM
2 minute read
Sidley Austin has successfully acted for the Mongolian national railway company in a $55m (£33m) High Court battle against Standard Bank.
The firm's client, JSC Ulaanbaatar Railways (UBR), faced a claim from Standard Bank for the direct payment of loans relating to a diesel order.
Although a full judgement is yet to be issued, the presiding judge Mr Justice Walker found Standard Bank's claim – while sufficiently strong to be tried on the merits – failed to clear the Civil Procedure Rules governing the jurisdictional gateway, and that the English court was not the proper forum for the case.
The High Court found the circumstances of the case pointed strongly to the Mongolian courts, and that it had not been established that a foreign investor such as Standard Bank would be treated unjustly if there were a trial in Ulaanbaatar.
UBR turned to a Sidley team headed by litigation partner Matthew Shankland – who joined the firm from Weil Gotshal & Manges last year - alongside associate Barney Connell. The company also used Mongolian firm MDS & Associates.
For the court appearances, Sidley instructed Daniel Toledano QC and Henry Hoskins of One Essex Court, while UBR retained Maizorig Janchivdorj of MDS & Associates in Ulaanbaatar.
Meanwhile, Clifford Chance (CC) litigation partner Roger Best and senior associate Chris Yates acted for Standard Bank, instructing David Joseph QC and Edward Brown of Essex Court Chambers.
CC is understood to be advising the bank in related arbitration matters.
"Our client is delighted with this outcome. It has always been their position that they were improperly joined in these proceedings in London and that the process was an attempt to avoid the obviously proper forum," commented Shankland. "This is a very sound ruling against forum shopping."
The litigator said the firm's decision to take an adverse position to a bank was fairly unique. "It depends on the situation with regard to conflict," he said. "Sidley doesn't make a habit of it, but we have a quite heavy focus on Mongolia as an emerging market, and we decided to take this on."
The firm's burgeoning connections with Mongolian corporates originates with Washington DC corporate partner Ayaz Shaikh, who has spent a lot of time in the emerging market in recent years.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250