Allen & Overy joins US heavyweights on historic £5.6bn Boots buy out
Allen & Overy (A&O), Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher have snared the key advisory roles on the £5.6bn takeover of UK pharmacy chain Alliance Boots by US drugs giant Walgreens.
August 06, 2014 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O), Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher have snared the key advisory roles on the £5.6bn takeover of UK pharmacy chain Alliance Boots by US drugs giant Walgreens.
Walgreens will take full control of Boots in early 2015, acquiring the 55% share in the company it did not already own.
Simpson Thacher New York M&A partner Mark Pflug is leading a team of lawyers across New York and London for Boots' private equity owner Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR), which took over the chain in 2007.
On that £9.7bn takeover, Clifford Chance staged a major coup by grabbing the mandate for KKR, despite the US buyout house's ongoing relationship with Simpson Thacher. Slaughter and May represented Boots Alliance on the 2007 deal, though it is unclear whether the magic circle has a role this time round.
Corporate work for Walgreens was carried out by an A&O team in Amsterdam led by partner Justin Steer with senior associate Emily Barker. Amsterdam competition head Paul Glazener acted on anti-trust matters.
An A&O team in London handled specialist work such as pensions, employment and environment matters. In total, according to a source at A&O, the firm has had more than 50 lawyers in different jurisdictions acting for Walgreens on the deal.
The US buyer has also instructed Wachtell, with the New York powerhouse fielding a team led by corporate partners Andrew Brownstein and Benjamin Roth.
Gibson Dunn is representing Lazard, the financial advisor to Walgreens. The firm's team includes New York corporate partners Eduardo Gallardo and Dennis Friedman.
Upon closure of the deal, the new company will operate under the name Walgreens Boots Alliance and will remain headquartered in the US. A number of other recent cross-border mergers have seen companies relocate to the UK for tax purposes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Hogan Lovells, Khaitan Lead On Beverage Company’s $890M Offering In India
Davis Polk, Simpson Thacher and Japan's Big Four Among Firms Engaged In Japanese Chipmaker’s $4.8B IPO
Can Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250