Addleshaw Goddard chief Burch bullish on CFAs as firm claims deals can reap seven figure annual gain
Addleshaw Goddard senior partner Monica Burch has reaffirmed the firm's commitment to offering conditional fee agreements (CFAs) for litigation work, despite a number of high-profile losses.
August 12, 2014 at 07:08 PM
3 minute read
Addleshaw Goddard senior partner Monica Burch has reaffirmed the firm's commitment to offering conditional fee agreements (CFAs) for litigation work, despite a number of high-profile losses.
Speaking to Legal Week, Burch said that the net benefit of using CFAs had topped seven figures annually a number of times since the firm first started pushing the arrangements in 2008. She added that additional fee income had also been generated through gaining and retaining work that the firm would otherwise have missed out on without offering a CFA.
"[CFAs] have been a real positive for us overall," Burch (pictured) said. "There have been one or two occasions when we have had to write down a bad debt but overall they have been good for us."
Addleshaws notably took a hit when it represented late Russian billionaire Boris Berezovsky in his dispute with Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich. The firm is thought to have taken the work on a conditional fee basis, acting for 50% of its usual rate for the duration of the dispute but missing out on a 100% uplift when Berezovsky lost the case.
While the firm itself has never confirmed or commented on its fees, it has previously been reported by Legal Week that the firm picked up a £15m success fee for a related case involving Berezovsky as part of its earnings from the oligarch's case, after Berezovsky issued proceedings in relation to claims that the family of former friend Badri Patarkatsishvili, who died in 2008, kept assets in which he had an interest.
Acting on a conditional fee basis, Addleshaws picked up more than £50m in total from the two Berezovsky cases.
In 2012, Addleshaws also won a £100m High Court case for Standard Life, representing the pensions and savings firm on a conditional fee basis.
Burch said that the firm also uses CFAs for a number of other clients.
"We have been able to retain some great work as a result of acting on CFAs," Burch said. "We were also able to have positive discussions with clients about funding which in litigation isn't always the case."
She added that the firm will continue to be innovative when it comes to litigation charges.
"We continue to think about our fees and how we can be more imaginative and commercial with our clients in terms of legal costs."
In 2008, Addleshaws launched Contro£, an initiative designed to lower the cost of litigation for clients through CFAs, third party funding and after-the-event insurance.
Addleshaws' committment to CFAs comes as Nabarro plans to offer fixed-fee arrangements for most of its commercial disputes work. The litigation practice is offering a fixed price for an entire dispute, as well as the option of set costs for specific stages or individual elements of the dispute.
The initiative, which is being led by Nabarro's head of disputes Jonathan Warne, marks a step away from hourly billing rates. Clients opting for a fixed fee package would agree a scheme for monthly payments in relation to the agreed fee.
Separately, Andrew Smith has become Addleshaws new head of business support and restructuring after former practice leader John Joyce was elected managing partner in May.
Related: Can Addleshaws regain old polish?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250