UK Top 50: consolidation drives growth at UK's largest firms as 85% see revenue hikes over five years
More than one in five of the UK's top 50 law firms have seen their fee income grow by at least 50% over the last five years, according to Legal Week's analysis of firms' financial performance
September 01, 2014 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
More than one in five of the UK's top 50 law firms have seen their fee income grow by at least 50% over the last five years, according to Legal Week's analysis of firms' financial performance.
The analysis, which spans the period from 2008-09 through to 2013-14, shows the pace and extent of growth at the upper end of the market, with six firms seeing at least an 80% rise in revenue. Of the 46 firms for which a full five-year comparison was possible, only seven brought in less in fee income in 2013-14 than five years previously, meaning 85% of firms grew in that period.
Consolidation was responsible for much of the growth, with the transformative tie-ups undertaken by several of the top 50 in the past half-decade reflected in exponential growth in turnover.
DWF has made the biggest leap forward in revenue terms, more than tripling its fee income from £61m in 2008-09 to £191m last year. The ambitious firm has embarked on a spree of mergers in recent times, with four tie-ups over the last two years alone, in addition to the acquisition of collapsed firm Cobbetts in February 2013.
Despite significantly increasing headcount, DWF also achieved the fourth largest profit per equity partner (PEP) increase over the five-year period, growing average PEP by 78% from £230,000 to £411,000. Only Shoosmiths, Travers Smith and Eversheds have registered higher percentage rises in PEP since 2009.
Mishcon de Reya placed second in terms of revenue growth, with a 121% increase from £47.3m to £104.6m.
Those firms that have undergone transformative mergers since 2009 inevitably feature prominently in the list of best performers over the period. These include Clyde & Co, which has increased turnover by 97%, Ashurst (95%), Herbert Smith Freehills (80%) and DAC Beachcroft (65%).
Clydes chief executive Peter Hasson says that its 2011 tie-up with legacy Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, a firm with revenue of around £90m at the time of the deal, was only part of its growth story. "Some of the trends in the market have been fortunate for us," explains Hasson. "Globalisation, the rise in the commodities market, growth in Asia – these have all been factors that have favoured us."
Firms that have not merged but still posted revenue hikes of more than 40% include Travers Smith (51%), TLT (49%), Holman Fenwick Willan (46%), Stephenson Harwood (42%) and Macfarlanes (41%), although it is worth noting that 2008-09′s results would have been affected by the financial crisis.
Sharon White, chief executive at Stephenson Harwood, says: "We are proud of what we've achieved as we haven't done it through a merger. It's all been organic growth, albeit some from laterals. We've never had a dip in revenue so we've maintained good growth throughout this tough period."
Among the magic circle firms, five-year changes in revenue have been more modest. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters even saw dips in turnover of 4.3% and 3.3% respectively. Allen & Overy (A&O) has grown the most since 2008-09, with a 13.1% revenue rise and a 12% hike in PEP.
"If you look at the market as a whole it's tricky because the demand for legal services has not grown in the same way over that five-year period as it had previously," says A&O managing partner Wim Dejonghe. "So if you have hardly any growth or none since the financial crisis you have probably done alright, and we've had 13% growth over that period so we have taken market share.
"We have improved our footprint while other firms haven't. The other element that is underestimated is the alternative delivery model, which has also helped grow the business."
However, over a longer 10-year period, the magic circle firms have, taken as a whole, increased combined fee income by 62%.
A&O logged the biggest uptick, growing 89% from £652m in 2003-04 to £1.2bn in the last financial year. Linklaters has seen a 74% rise over the same period, with Freshfields up by 57%.
Click here to view the full table of the top 50 results
Full coverage of Legal Week's UK top 50 coverage can be found here
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Threat of Trump Tariffs Is Sign Canada Needs to Wean Off Reliance on Trade with U.S., Trade Lawyers Say
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Data Disposition—Conquering the Seemingly Unscalable Mountain
- 2Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250