UK Top 50: consolidation drives growth at UK's largest firms as 85% see revenue hikes over five years
More than one in five of the UK's top 50 law firms have seen their fee income grow by at least 50% over the last five years, according to Legal Week's analysis of firms' financial performance
September 01, 2014 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
More than one in five of the UK's top 50 law firms have seen their fee income grow by at least 50% over the last five years, according to Legal Week's analysis of firms' financial performance.
The analysis, which spans the period from 2008-09 through to 2013-14, shows the pace and extent of growth at the upper end of the market, with six firms seeing at least an 80% rise in revenue. Of the 46 firms for which a full five-year comparison was possible, only seven brought in less in fee income in 2013-14 than five years previously, meaning 85% of firms grew in that period.
Consolidation was responsible for much of the growth, with the transformative tie-ups undertaken by several of the top 50 in the past half-decade reflected in exponential growth in turnover.
DWF has made the biggest leap forward in revenue terms, more than tripling its fee income from £61m in 2008-09 to £191m last year. The ambitious firm has embarked on a spree of mergers in recent times, with four tie-ups over the last two years alone, in addition to the acquisition of collapsed firm Cobbetts in February 2013.
Despite significantly increasing headcount, DWF also achieved the fourth largest profit per equity partner (PEP) increase over the five-year period, growing average PEP by 78% from £230,000 to £411,000. Only Shoosmiths, Travers Smith and Eversheds have registered higher percentage rises in PEP since 2009.
Mishcon de Reya placed second in terms of revenue growth, with a 121% increase from £47.3m to £104.6m.
Those firms that have undergone transformative mergers since 2009 inevitably feature prominently in the list of best performers over the period. These include Clyde & Co, which has increased turnover by 97%, Ashurst (95%), Herbert Smith Freehills (80%) and DAC Beachcroft (65%).
Clydes chief executive Peter Hasson says that its 2011 tie-up with legacy Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, a firm with revenue of around £90m at the time of the deal, was only part of its growth story. "Some of the trends in the market have been fortunate for us," explains Hasson. "Globalisation, the rise in the commodities market, growth in Asia – these have all been factors that have favoured us."
Firms that have not merged but still posted revenue hikes of more than 40% include Travers Smith (51%), TLT (49%), Holman Fenwick Willan (46%), Stephenson Harwood (42%) and Macfarlanes (41%), although it is worth noting that 2008-09′s results would have been affected by the financial crisis.
Sharon White, chief executive at Stephenson Harwood, says: "We are proud of what we've achieved as we haven't done it through a merger. It's all been organic growth, albeit some from laterals. We've never had a dip in revenue so we've maintained good growth throughout this tough period."
Among the magic circle firms, five-year changes in revenue have been more modest. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters even saw dips in turnover of 4.3% and 3.3% respectively. Allen & Overy (A&O) has grown the most since 2008-09, with a 13.1% revenue rise and a 12% hike in PEP.
"If you look at the market as a whole it's tricky because the demand for legal services has not grown in the same way over that five-year period as it had previously," says A&O managing partner Wim Dejonghe. "So if you have hardly any growth or none since the financial crisis you have probably done alright, and we've had 13% growth over that period so we have taken market share.
"We have improved our footprint while other firms haven't. The other element that is underestimated is the alternative delivery model, which has also helped grow the business."
However, over a longer 10-year period, the magic circle firms have, taken as a whole, increased combined fee income by 62%.
A&O logged the biggest uptick, growing 89% from £652m in 2003-04 to £1.2bn in the last financial year. Linklaters has seen a 74% rise over the same period, with Freshfields up by 57%.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250