It pays to read the small print - the dissertation on IT and law that transformed a career
"It was 1981, and IBM had just launched its first PC. I was an undergraduate at Glasgow University and was almost alone in the law school in being excited about the possible impact of this new technology. I wanted to understand what the computer might mean for the legal world - how might it revolutionise this remarkably traditional profession into which I was heading?
September 07, 2014 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
"It was 1981, and IBM had just launched its first PC. I was an undergraduate at Glasgow University and was almost alone in the law school in being excited about the possible impact of this new technology. I wanted to understand what the computer might mean for the legal world – how might it revolutionise this remarkably traditional profession into which I was heading?
"IT was clearly not on the curriculum and so I had to find a different way to become involved. In the grand tradition of the law, I turned to the small print. I scoured the regulations governing the LLB degree, and to my surprise and delight found a regulation that allowed students to submit a 20,000-word dissertation on a subject of their choice instead of sitting one of their final papers. Game on.
"I delved into the literature on computers and law and elected to write my paper on whether computers might ever replace judges. I had no idea then that this choice would be a significant turning point in my life, perhaps the most pivotal in my career. I also had no idea that I was the first person in the history of the law school to invoke the dissertation clause.
"My particular interest was in the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in the law. I discovered there were only 26 publications on this subject in the English language. As I conducted my research (with no computer and certainly no internet to help), I was drawn into exploring much wider ideas about the future of the legal industry and the forces of change that could transform it in the coming decades. I found myself more strongly attracted to researching the field in more detail and in becoming an active player in bringing about change. I no longer wanted to be a solicitor or advocate.
"In due course, I submitted my dissertation, initially optimistic about its likely reception – I assumed that none of my tutors would know much about technology. I had not known, however, that external examiners can be used in such circumstances. My reading of the small print had not uncovered this point. When I learned of this, I then feared my paper would be passed along to some leading world expert. In the event, happily, the examiners seemed to like it.
"By that time, I had made up my mind to try to write a doctorate on the subject and went to Oxford in 1983 to do just that. I spent much of 1980s on AI in the law, unaware of course that the Web would be invented in the early 1990s and that its relevance for the law would be the focus of The Future Of Law, my fourth book but the first one read by people other than my family and friends."
Professor Richard Susskind OBE is an author, speaker, and independent adviser to major professional firms and to national governments. He is president of the Society for Computers and Law and IT adviser to the Lord Chief Justice.
This article was commissioned for the Turning Points hub, an online career development resource from Legal Week in association with Berwin Leighton Paisner.
How do you see your career progressing? Click here to complete a quick, semi-serious survey on partners, perks and paychecks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250