Deloitte research shows UK top 10 drop in fee income for Q1 2014-15
Shrinking fee earner numbers and a decline in pound sterling rates has caused a year on year drop in fee income at the UK's top 10 firms for Q1 2014-15, according to Deloitte's legal sector survey.
September 18, 2014 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Shrinking fee earner numbers and a decline in pound sterling rates has caused a year on year drop in fee income at the UK's top 10 firms for Q1 2014-15, according to Deloitte's legal sector survey.
The auditor's research shows a mixed performance across the 100 firms in the three months leading to 31 July. Average fee income among the top 10 dipped by 2.7%, contrasting with an increase of 6.2% for firms ranked 11 to 25 and growth of 5.3% for those between 26 to 50. The remaining 50 recorded an increase of 11.2%.
The auditor attributed the decrease within the largest firms to a 2.1% fall in fee earner headcount as well as the strong pound, which has in turn weakened revenue coming in from overseas offices.
On the other hand the uptick for firms in the 11-25 bracket was buoyed by increases in chargeable hours per fee earner of 3.5% on top of improvements in rates. Fee earner numbers stayed broadly static.
The auditor said average growth in fee income across the UK's 100 top firms has grown year on year by 6.1% for the last quarter, which is largely down to a spate of merger activity and lateral hires in the last 12 months. Firms ranked 26 to 50 grew headcount by 5%.
The top 10 has predicted year-on-year Q1 growth in fee income of just over 2%, while firms ranked 11-25 forecast an uptick of just over 5%. Those between 26 to 50 have estimated an increase of 7%.
"Confidence is definitely building but fairly slowly," said Deloitte professional practices partner Jeremy Black (pictured). For the top ten, I think the market is still challenging as there is still a lot of uncertainty in the global economy. Things are moving in a positive direction in key geographies but it is still hard to gain growth in the market.
"I think those in the 11 to 25 category put in a stronger performance because on average the group has more firms with a London focus. Meanwhile I expect more consolidation will occur in the lower half of the 100, particularly for those specialising in volume work, as a large number of firms are based outside London and continue to find the market very difficult."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250