Slaughters reaches 20% female partnership as gender divide widens for Clifford Chance fee earners
Slaughter and May has grown its proportion of female partners to 20%, while the figure dipped marginally at magic circle rival Clifford Chance.
October 08, 2014 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
Slaughter and May has grown its proportion of female partners to 20%, while the figure dipped marginally at magic circle rival Clifford Chance (CC).
Slaughters' latest figures, dated 31 January 2014, show the number of women in the partnership has marginally increased by 1% to account for 20% of the partnership when compared with statistics for 1 May 2013. The percentage of female trainees has stayed static at 46.6%.
The figures also show the proportion of partners self reporting as being from a minority ethnic group decreased in the nine months leading to February, representing 5.7% of partners in 2014 compared with 7% in the previous year. Minority ethnic representation also fell from 20% to 17.3% for solicitors and from 26% to 19.5% for trainees.
Four out of every 10 partners at the firm were educated at a state school in the UK, with 47.1% going to independent or fee paying school. A further 10% were educated abroad, with 2.9% declining to reveal details of their schooling.
The gap widened among all lawyers at the firm, where the figures show 30% attended state school and 49.7% were privately educated.
Those among the first generation of their family to attend university accounted for 45.7% of partners and 19.8% of solicitors this year.
The firm has also released data covering age, sexual orientation, disability, faith and caring responsibilities.
Similar statistics for CC, dated 30 April this year, show that the year on year percentage for female partners has dipped slightly from 16.3% to 16%. In London women accounted for 19% of partners.
The percentage of female fee earners firmwide has also slightly dropped, from 49.1% to 48.5%. The London office's percentage similarly decreased from 53.6% to 52.9%.
Figures also show that the number of London partners self-reporting as coming from an ethnic minority stayed static at nine, the equivalent of 6.3% of the City partnership.
The firm has additionally released figures dated 31 May 2014 to account for newly promoted partners. According to these figures, the firmwide proportion of female partners across the firm is 16.9%, while in London the figure is 21%.
The figures also show 5.6% of London partners are from an ethnic minority group. In recent years CC set a long-term intention of achieving 30% female representation across its global partnership.
The news comes as CC's lawyers have decreased their pro bono contributions by 5.4% to 52,346 hours during 2013-14. The firm's annual corporate responsibility report values the time invested in pro bono work at £18.1m, down on last year's equivalent of £19.2m. The firm has pledged to increase the proportion of lawyers doing pro bono work from 54% to 60% for 2014-15.
Meanwhile, business services volunteering hours dropped by 7% to 4,153, which the firm has vowed to investigate.
The latest data from magic circle peer Linklaters in 2014 show women made up 17% of its global partnership and 22% of its UK partner numbers, while at Allen & Overy (A&O) global female partner count dipped marginally over the last year, from 16% to 15%. Women accounted for 17% of partners at A&O's London office.
Slaughters' efforts to improve diversity at the firm include a working from home pilot initiative, which is open to 89 associates as well as partners across its key practice groups. Participants have been trialling working from home one day per fortnight.
How effective is your law firm's IT? Complete this Legal Week survey for a chance to win an iPad Air: click here
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250