Breaking into the leadership constellation? Keep close to clients and act like a politician
Conventional models of leadership are predicated on the assumption that leaders, by definition, must have followers.
October 15, 2014 at 04:47 AM
4 minute read
To become effective law firm leaders, lawyers must develop political expertise
Conventional models of leadership are predicated on the assumption that leaders, by definition, must have followers. But in a law firm the distinction between leaders and followers is problematic because power is widely distributed.
Power in general belongs to the people who control access to key resources. In a law firm these resources are major client relationships, valuable specialist expertise and a strong reputation.
Leadership in law firms presents a distinctive set of challenges. Conventional models of leadership don't apply. Instead, through my research into professional services firms, including more than 20 law firms, I've developed the concept of the 'leadership constellation' to help identify the key actors in the leadership dynamics of a law firm.
This leadership constellation expresses the informal power structure of the law firm that overlaps with and sits alongside the formal authority structure.
At the centre is the senior executive dyad or pairing – typically a managing partner and a senior partner, or a chairman and a chief executive. Then there are a few selected heads of major fee-earning areas such as specific practices or offices – not all, just the key ones. Many firms also have heads of business services, such as the CFO or the head of human resources. And finally there are the key influencers. They may have no formal leadership role but they have power derived from their control of the key resources.
How do lawyers get into a position in the leadership constellation? And how do they operate effectively once they are there?
First, a lawyer must be successful in the marketplace if peers are to accept him or her as worthy to lead them. Having won the legitimacy to lead, it is vital that these lawyers remain close to clients. As they move away from full-time fee-earning work, they shouldn't become dependent on their colleagues to tell them what clients are thinking. Knowledge of clients is the only way lawyers can continue to exploit the personal legitimacy that clients confer.
As one practice head said to me: "My predecessor, who's very, very good, made a classic mistake of cutting right back on his practice and becoming full-time management. And that doesn't work in a firm like ours. You lose credibility doing that. You have to be able to show that you can still cut it."
Lawyers in the leadership constellation must also interact politically while appearing apolitical. Many interviewees explained that they were not political, that most of their colleagues weren't either and that those colleagues who were seen to be political tended to suffer as a result.
But law firms are rife with politics. It is simply an organisational fact of life. Their leaders therefore need a high degree of political skill. This is partly because lawyers create these conditions through their formal governance structures: elections are held and candidates issue manifestos and give speeches at debates, talking of 'their electorate', 'constituents' and 'mandates'.
As with a politician, a leader within a law firm needs to build and sustain consensus among his or her colleagues, making trade-offs between competing interest groups, and offering incentives to individuals to lend their support to particular initiatives.
Lawyers' professed abhorrence of politics seems to arise from their conceptualisation of political behaviour as Machiavellian duplicity and unscrupulousness. But in truth, successful politicians have four key qualities: social astuteness, interpersonal influence, networking ability and apparent sincerity.
Framed in these terms, it becomes clear that leaders of law firms must be supremely effective politicians. And, as with the best politicians, their skill comes in persuading their colleagues and their electorate that they are not pursuing their own self-interests, but are genuinely motivated by the desire to improve the situation of the people around them.
Laura Empson is professor in the Management of Professional Service Firms at Cass Business School. Her research can be found at www.cass.city.ac.uk/cpsf.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Law Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250