Slaughters, Clifford Chance among firms sealing £2.3bn debt restructuring for Punch Taverns
Slaughter and May, Clifford Chance (CC) and Hogan Lovells are among the lead advisers on pubs giant Punch Taverns' £2.3bn debt refinancing.
October 15, 2014 at 05:56 AM
2 minute read
Slaughter and May, Clifford Chance (CC) and Hogan Lovells have won advisory roles on pubs giant Punch Taverns' £2.3bn debt refinancing.
Punch, which began talks on its restructuring nearly two years ago, received the approval needed for its restructuring proposals from the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) and Lloyds Bank last week.
The deal, which has reduced net debt by £600m to £1.5bn, included a debt-for-equity swap that has given bondholders 85% of the company's equity.
Slaughters corporate partner David Johnson, who is also the client relationship partner, led the team advising Punch Taverns on the deal alongside financing partner Guy O'Keefe, restructuring partner Ian Johnson and financing partner Ed Fife.
Johnson said: "It marks one of the most complex financial restructurings the market has seen in recent years. It was a complicated capital structure to work on – we have been trying to reach a consensual agreement for the past two years, as there were a large number of parts to it."
City-based Cravath Swaine & Moore corporate partner Philip Boeckman represented Punch on US matters.
CC represented RBS, with a team comprising partner John MacLennan, who advised on restructuring aspects, and structured finance partner Jessica Littlewood, who provided counsel on securitisation.
Lloyds turned to Hogan Lovells London restructuring and insolvency partner Stephen Foster for advice.
Punch has been involved in protracted negotiations with senior lenders, represented by an Association of British Insurers (ABI) committee, on the proposals.
Latham & Watkins London structured finance partner Mark Nicolaides advised the ABI committee. Meanwhile Linklaters capital markets partner Mark Nuttall advised junior creditors on securitisation.
Slaughters is a longstanding adviser to Punch, and has acted on several deals in recent years including its demerger with pub company Spirit in 2011.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTribunal Dismisses AML Case Against Kennedys’ Chief Risk Officer, But Ex-Partner Fined
2 minute readFCA Fines Metro Bank £16.7M Over ‘Financial Crime Failings’
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250