Fee income grew at 80% of firms last year, PwC research finds
80% of law firms have increased fee income over the last year with 70% achieving rises above inflation, according to PwC's annual law firm survey.
October 19, 2014 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Eight out of every 10 law firms increased fee income in 2013-14, with 70% achieving rises above inflation, according to PwC's annual survey of the sector.
Despite pricing pressures, stability and confidence is returning to the legal sector, the report finds, with the number of UK law firms increasing fee income higher than at any time since 2008.
Significant merger activity has contributed to the overall uptick in fee income, and PwC's survey suggests that the legal sector has benefitted from consolidation in the market after previous years' results indicated that an over-supply of firms offering legal services had a negative impact on income.
At top 10 firms, average profit per equity partner (PEP) exceeded £1million for first time in six years, up 4% on 2013. However, more than half of the increase was driven by a 5% reduction in full equity partner headcount.
At 40%, top 10 firms recorded their highest average net profit margin since PwC's annual survey was launched 23 years ago. Firms ranked between 11-25 by the accountant have finally reversed a five-year trend of margin deterioration by posting an increase, with profit margin rising from 26.0% to 28.2%.
David Snell, leader of PwC's law firm advisory group, said: "The survey paints a brighter picture for the future of law firms than a year ago. The majority of firms surveyed expressed confidence about their growth prospects over the coming three years, although uncertainty remains about growth prospects for the sector as a whole. Merger activity looks set to continue, and international expansion remains a priority for many."
Despite the improved topline figures, all categories of firms saw fee income per chargeable hour fall: by 8.1% for top 10 firms; by 2.8% for firms ranked 11-25; and by 9.3% for those in the 26-50 group.
Combined with an increase in chargeable hours to near 2008 levels, PwC's findings suggest firms are busier, but pricing pressures remain acute.
Snell added: "With challenges around the business model, changing client demands, and talent retention, law firms are operating in a very different market to that of five years ago. Recent law firm failures and enforced mergers are a reminder that the tide can turn very quickly."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Adds Two Goodwin Leveraged Finance Specialists as Partners in Paris
2 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250