Long-serving Pinsent Masons managing partner Ryan opts against running for re-election
Pinsent Masons' veteran managing partner David Ryan has decided not to run for re-election when his current term comes to an end in April next year.
October 24, 2014 at 05:04 AM
2 minute read
Pinsent Masons' veteran managing partner David Ryan has decided not to run for re-election when his current term comes to an end in April next year.
Ryan (pictured), who has served nearly 16 years at the helm of the firm, guiding it through three mergers and openings in France, Germany, the Gulf, China and Singapore, says he intends to remain heavily involved in Pinsents' central management team "to help ensure continuity at the executive level". He will also take up a senior role leading projects.
Ryan said: "My enthusiasm for our business is undimmed so the decision not to stand again was a difficult one. The firm has made tremendous progress towards achieving its 2020 vision since we first articulated it in 2008.
"However, on reflection my feeling was that I can still make a significant contribution to helping the firm achieve its strategic ambitions without doing that as the managing partner. My immediate focus now is on ensuring a strong second half in an important year for the firm."
Timings of the election for Ryan's successor are yet to be decided; however the firm is aiming to complete the process as soon as possible to allow for a smooth transition after his term ends.
Ryan, who was initially voted in as managing partner of legacy Pinsent Curtis in 1999, oversaw the firm's subsequent mergers with Biddle in 2001 and Masons in 2004, followed by its takeover of Scots firm McGrigors in 2012.
Pinsents recently voted in construction chief Richard Foley as its new senior partner following a contested election against Chris Mullen, who had held the post since 2005. The election was the first to be contested since Ryan took the managing partner role in 1998.
Ryan and Mullen were last reappointed to their positions in uncontested elections in 2008, with an expected election in 2012 postponed due to the McGrigors tie-up.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Adds Two Goodwin Leveraged Finance Specialists as Partners in Paris
2 minute readEversheds and Noerr hire Brussels' Partners & Other Key European Moves
3 minute readEx-Armstrong Teasdale Lawyer Spent £14M in Client Accounts to Buy Jewels, Pay Credit Cards
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Rejects New Trial for Tom Girardi, Whose Testimony Was 'Consistent With the Defense Case'
- 2New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 3The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
- 4Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 5Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250