Bird & Bird looks to use US partners on Virtual GC scheme as flexi-service signs second major client
Bird and Bird has signed a second major client to its Virtual General Counsel service, with the remote offering now covering all areas of legal advice for IT company Ntegra.
October 28, 2014 at 08:13 PM
2 minute read
Bird and Bird has signed a second major client to its Virtual General Counsel service, with the remote offering now covering all areas of legal advice for IT company Ntegra.
The long-term contract will see Virtual GC project leader Howard Rubin act as GC for the company, working remotely using Bird & Bird resources. Ntegra had no in-house capability prior to the agreement with Bird & Bird.
Bird & Bird's initiative was first made available in 2012, offering to cut companies' spending on full-time in-house legal teams by having a partner at the firm allocate work amongst its fee earners, who pick up briefs depending on their specialisms.
In June 2012, Two Birds signed up games developer Codemasters to the service, the first client to use the remote legal provision for the entirety of its legal work. The scheme helped the firm win the recent Financial Times Innovative Lawyers award for Most Innovative Law Firm in Client Service.
Rubin is currently the only partner on the Virtual GC project, though he told Legal Week that other partners, mainly outside the UK, were interested in the service. The Virtual GC management team current involves around 10 associates plus some specialist lawyers.
"It's very easy working with colleagues in other offices," said Rubin. "I create a team of people who service the client, who are point men, but then manage the work internally."
Bird & Bird is currently in discussions with a US company with the hope of signing up its first stateside client to the service. It also hopes to add another UK based company in the near future.
"It's a great opportunity," continued Rubin. "I think the strategy of the service is in two parts; one is international, the other is being able to form a close relationship with the client. The service will be very powerful for US companies with only a small presence in Europe and Asia."
Bird & Bird started pushing the service to US clients last summer.
"It can be a difficult concept to sell," said Rubin. "It's about convincing clients they are good to go when there's always the fear that legal fees will get in the way of getting the advice."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Cleary Gottlieb Act on $700M Dunlop Tire Brand Sale to Japan's Sumitomo
Stewarts and DAC Beachcroft Lead on £2B Leicester City Helicopter Crash Litigation
Israel's Rushed Corporate Tax May Spark Law Firm Mergers, Boost Large Firms Including Gornitzky
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thompson Coe, 2 Lawyers, Hit by $1M+ Legal Mal Suit
- 2Regulatory Intelligence Platform Abstract Announces $4.8 Million in Seed Funding
- 3Former Sacks Weston Partner Faces 5-Year Suspension Over Mail, Wire Fraud Conviction
- 47th Circ. Revives Transactional Dispute Against Military Retailer, Sends to State Court
- 5Lavish 'Lies' Led to Investors Being Fleeced in Nine-Figure International Crypto Scam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250