'I aim to make our partners feel uncomfortable' – CC's Sweeting outlines his second term strategy
Clifford Chance (CC) last week re-elected senior partner Malcolm Sweeting for a second four-year term starting in January 2015.
October 30, 2014 at 08:26 PM
4 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) last week re-elected senior partner Malcolm Sweeting for a second four-year term starting in January 2015. Having won a contested three-way election in 2010, the unopposed vote this time round appears to have been a much more serene affair.
But Sweeting sees more concrete challenges ahead than he did as a management ingenue four years ago. He admits to being "slightly naive going into the role", candidly adding that he was perhaps not as attuned to how the wider economy and changes in the legal market affected the firm as he should have been.
"At the time of my initial election I accept I had a Panglossian view of the world and the challenges we faced," Sweeting tells Legal Week. "I had not truly appreciated the far-reaching and long-lasting issues in the global economy […] and the fundamental challenges that our clients, [the firm] and the legal market would face over the following four years."
He adds that the market is "undergoing fundamental change that is being driven by clients". One significant consequence of this change could be a review of CC's longstanding commitment to its traditional partner remuneration structure.
In an interview with Legal Week in 2011, Sweeting asserted he could not see any persuasive arguments in favour of altering CC's lockstep system. This time round, however, he accepts that the model faces increasing challenges.
"Firms need to think carefully about how they structure compensation in response to the trends of globalisation and intense competition for the very best talent globally," he says. "[Lockstep] remains central to the strong and supportive culture of our firm but that is not to say that current compensation structures will necessarily remain unchanged forever. It is something we must sensibly keep under review in a fast-changing environment."
Despite his new insight into the market, Sweeting's key objectives have carried over into his second term. Client work remains his top priority, but the increasing pace of regulation, globalisation and change in technology has caused him to be more mindful of shifting client requirements and, crucially, how the competition is handling them.
According to Sweeting, the rise of three new models for law firms over the past four years has presented substantial challenges to the way CC operates. He lists these as firms operating though global combinations, alternative business structures and the recent return of accounting firms into law firms' territory.
"The rise of these models is contributing to much greater competition and there is a clear imperative for the old global order to respond to survive and prosper in tomorrow's very different markets," he says.
In the meantime Sweeting has had ample opportunity to polish up his management style, which hinges on pushing partners outside their comfort zones.
"I deliberately aim to challenge our partners and make them feel slightly uncomfortable," he explains. "I think it is important for leadership to do this; it is something I have [learned] in the role. To say that there are no issues affecting the firm or its success would not be credible – partners would feel let down and disappointed by such a lack of intellectual rigour.
"The firm wants its leaders to be anticipating and responding to change in our markets and in our clients, as well as to understand the challenges partners face and to ensure they remain on their toes. But this goes hand-in-hand with instilling in all our people the confidence that they can succeed."
As the firm's ambassador, visibility among partners remains vital. With eight new offices opening since 2010, maintaining this entails racking up substantially more air miles.
CC's international coverage is likely to grow again in the next four years, though the locations may be different from those on the agenda in 2010. Sweeting is targeting more work from developing markets such as Nigeria, South Africa and Azerbaijan. This contrasts with four years ago when Brazil and Russia were widely tipped as the key growth markets.
The shift in international focus demonstrates how much has changed between Sweeting first taking up office and now. In a post-recessionary environment that has also seen a fundamental shift in the delivery of legal services, Sweeting might expect to form a still worldlier view of the market by 2019.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Law Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 2Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 3Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 4Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 5Friday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250