Charles Russell Speechlys sets out ambitious plans to take on City heavyweights as new firm opens its doors
As Charles Russell Speechlys opens for business this month, the strategy of the newest entrant into the UK's top 25 firms is beginning to come into focus.
November 04, 2014 at 08:46 AM
4 minute read
As Charles Russell Speechlys opens for business this month, the strategy of the newest entrant into the UK's top 25 firms is beginning to come into focus.
While both legacy firms have a notable private client heritage, senior partner Christopher Page says there is a subtle change in emphasis for the newly combined outfit.
"We are using private wealth as our hook rather than private client," he tells Legal Week. "That incorporates rather more than the traditional estates planning, tax and trusts work."
Page says this shift was one of the key drivers behind the merger. Both firms realised they needed to look at how they could bolster the commercial elements of their traditional private client work, including developing their real estate and corporate practices.
"Many of the clients will have fairly substantial corporate interests, which they've either owned for many generations or only acquired fairly recently through entrepreneurial activity," points out managing partner James Carter. "If we are going to provide a truly integrated service it's about those businesses as well as the individuals."
The new management team wants to challenge the likes of Macfarlanes and Taylor Wessing, rather than a traditional private client powerhouse such as Farrers.
"Farrers are excellent at what they do but I'm not sure they would say they have the same litigation or commercial arms as we now do," says Page.
"If you look at Macfarlanes' private client offering they are a top rated private client practice. But they are also a firm that takes private client beyond private client into private wealth," Carter adds. "They may not badge themselves as [that] overtly, but that's what we will do."
Convincing the market that it has the corporate nous to handle that type of work is the next test. Though the new firm's private client credentials are hardly in doubt – one Farrers partner says they are "looking forward to the challenge of facing an even more formidable opponent" – it may be a bigger leap to challenge the City heavyweights it now has in its crosshairs.
"My view on mergers like this is that if you put two firms together, just because you're a bigger firm you don't necessarily lift the practices into the upper tier," says a partner at a rival firm. "Speechly do have a corporate practice but that operates at the lower end of the market."
To bridge that gap in perception, Carter says the initial focus is most likely to be on strengthening its corporate offering.
"Do I think we are more likely to recruit in that area? The answer may be yes. When you already have a top private client practice the ability to recruit into that is relatively modest."
Of the legacy firms' combined £130.5m 2013-14 turnover, litigation accounts for some £21.9m and real estate £27.6m, compared to private client at £35m and business services at around £46m.
With extra size comes a broader geographical gaze too, with management saying that the firm will target regions where the private wealth work already exists, such as the Gulf and sub-Saharan Africa.
The new firm is ambitious but some important housekeeping still remains to be sorted out. Management want staff from legacy Speechlys' old headquarters at 6 New Street Square working alongside those from Charles Russell's London base at 5 Fleet Place – currently the combined firm's head office – in one London location, saving on the merged firm's substantial office costs.
While the firm has no immediate plans to shift from its two-location set up, Carter and Page hope the situation is only temporary.
"There's no denying the objective is to get the maximum use out of our premises," Carter says. "The issue that always comes up is why can't you sort this out quickly? But you can't sort out two large premises in the middle of London in just six months."
Such teething issues may be inevitable, but once the merger settles down, the firm is committed to matching its ambition and challenging some of the City's most respected players.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKMPG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Miami Attorneys Secure $4M Settlement Despite Insurance Limits
- 2NY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
- 3Legaltech Rundown: Alexi Launches an AI Litigation Tool, Hotshot Announces Private Equity Practice Courses, and More
- 46-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 5'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250