Making a difference – why firms should fully commit to the solicitor apprenticeship scheme
There's still plenty of work left to do when it comes to diversity in the legal profession, says Georgina Stanley
November 06, 2014 at 07:05 PM
3 minute read
Campaigning is not a word commonly associated with the legal profession or legal journalism. And why would it be? Long-hour culture aside, well-paid graduates working in well-appointed offices don't tend to attract too much public sympathy or have much change to fight for. Except when it comes to diversity, where there is so much room for improvement – be it gender, race or social mobility – and where campaigning is exactly what the industry needs.
The growing number of firms setting targets for female representation within the partnership and at management level shows this at least is a concern at the forefront of their strategies, even though they face a decidedly uphill battle given the work-life balance issues that are now part and parcel of the job.
But on the other two metrics – despite the wholesale take-up of the PRIME work experience initiative intended to encourage those from disadvantaged backgrounds into the profession – there is still an awful lot more to do.
Which is why the industry as a whole – including private practice and in-house teams – needs to fully support the government-backed Trailblazer Apprenticeships in Law scheme. A workable apprenticeship programme that allows talented school leavers unable, or unwilling, to take on high levels of debt at university to qualify as solicitors (as well as paralegals or legal executives) could revolutionise the profession, but it will only happen with the right backing.
Inevitable minimum requirements at A-level mean it is unlikely to solve the white, privately educated stereotype of commercial lawyers entirely, but it could certainly make a significant difference.
With some 18 firms as well as in-house departments at the likes of Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland currently involved in the consultation, it looks to be moving in the right direction. But for something of this scale to come off it needs more than consultations and good intentions. In addition to workable standards and training that will put apprentice lawyers on a par with graduate lawyers, the scheme needs full commitment from firms to fundamentally shift their recruitment processes and take on apprentices.
For the initiative to transform entry to the profession in the way accountancy apprenticeships have done, it will also need a shift in mindset among even the stuffiest of partners, so that what is created is an industry with multiple routes to qualification, not just a two-tier system.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250