India's Wadia & Ghandy pulls out of Singapore
Indian law firm Wadia Ghandy & Co is to review its international strategy following the closure of its Singapore office.
November 07, 2014 at 02:51 AM
3 minute read
Indian law firm Wadia Ghandy & Co is to review its international strategy following the closure of its Singapore office.
The 30 partner and 150-lawyer outfit, among the oldest firms in India and ranked band 1 by Chambers & Partners for domestic disputes and real estate work, shut its doors on Singapore less than four years after opening, citing a difficult economic climate.
The firm launched in Singapore in 2011, and had just one partner on the ground targeting Indian inbound work by Singaporean and international clients.
Joint managing partner Ashish Ahuja said it was difficult to generate new business in the city-state partly because non-clients going into India had already established relationships with local firms.
"For our existing clients, us being there didn't add value to them," he told Legal Week.
"[Other companies] stuck to their loyalties. There was already sufficient capacity. Most had already built good a rapport with Indian firms."
The closure of Wadia's Singapore office comes as India's largest law firm – Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co – takes steps towards opening its first international base, with Singapore on the list of possible destinations.
Joint managing partner of that firm Shardul Shroff said it remained extremely difficult for Indian firms to develop a foreign network of offices in light of restrictions on business development activites at home and a lack of Indian companies going abroad.
However, Ahuja remains optimistic about his firm's international expansion strategy, saying it is currently considering alternative geographies and practices.
He believes nothing more could have been done to make the Singapore base successful, it was simply a case of tough economic circumstances. For now partners will continue to focus on the firm's six Indian offices located in Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Mumbai and Pune.
"We will always pursue an international strategy, but we need to do it at the right point of time, we need to go back to the drawing board.
"[With Singapore] I think we were in the right place but at the wrong time."
Singapore's legal market is currently being tapped by a raft of international firms and Asian legal outfits, despite imposing a strict set of rules which ban the majority of foreign lawyers from practising locally.
As South East Asia's main legal hub, it is a base from which many firms service markets such as Indonesia, India and the Philippines, and continues to host a large number of regional arbitration proceedings.
Earlier this week, the government also announced the opening of Singapore's new international mediation centre.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250