It's no beach holiday – the offshore firms dealing with the global regulatory crackdown and an increasing workload
Changes at a global regulatory level affecting offshore jurisdictions have been matched by the growth in new types of work for the firms that operate there, as Anthony Harrington reports
November 26, 2014 at 10:59 AM
6 minute read
Changes at a global regulatory level affecting offshore jurisdictions have been matched by the growth in new types of work for the firms that operate there, as Anthony Harrington reports
The offshore world has been going through an extraordinary period. Serious initiatives on the part of major governments to combat tax evasion by wealthy individuals have come alongside major pan-national initiatives from the European Union and the OECD to crack down on multinationals shifting profits from high-tax to low-tax regimes.
But offshore law firms have been maturing in recent years, developing new and more complex types of work and reaching out to offshore companies to demonstrate that they are up to the job of handling major cross-border transactions and litigation.
Peter Tarn, London managing partner and chairman of the executive committee at Harney Westwood & Riegels, which also has offices in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), Cayman Islands and Cyprus, does not see the current anti-tax dodging legislation from the US and elsewhere affecting his firm's work.
"These changes, in many ways, are old news and have been ongoing for the last 10 to 15 years," he says. "There is an enduring misconception in the media that there are vast sums of money stashed away in these offshore jurisdictions. In fact, if you look at the sums on deposit, while there is some overnight lending from US institutions
in the Caymans, there is nothing to speak of in the BVI. What is there is all corporate
money and there really are no hiding places for personal money.
"The automatic exchange of information is a reality and has been such for the last two to three years. We probably see as much opportunity as threat in the implementation of transparency because, once the G20 governments are comfortable that they have real visibility of what goes on in these jurisdictions, a lot of the negativity will fall away."
The one big change over the last five years in offshore jurisdictions, he explains, has been a huge increase in contentious work. If you take the BVI, five or six years ago most court proceedings were interlocutory skirmishes. Now there is much more substance to these trials, which are mostly corporate-to-corporate or individual-to-individual disputes over trusts or joint ventures, where assets are held in offshore structures. The root of this change, according to Tarn, is that offshore legal teams are now increasingly viewed by clients and onshore firms as having the expertise to manage serious litigation.
Marcus Leese, a partner with Ogier's Guernsey practice, agrees that for the leading offshore centres, such as the BVI, Cayman, Guernsey, Jersey and Luxembourg, the issues of information disclosure and tax compliance are not new challenges.
Getting the right message across
The two notable changes that the Guernsey office has seen in 2014 are significant increases in enquiries and instructions, most notably to do with M&A work and the banking and finance sectors. Leese puts this down to the continued recovery of the global economy, and greater interest in and use of some of the newer structures available offshore, such as Guernsey and Jersey foundations.
Looking ahead, he says: "An important and difficult ongoing issue is the need to balance two different messages to our clients, especially those in emerging markets.
"On the one hand, doing business offshore is attractive because it has fewer legal and regulatory complications than onshore. On the other, people need to understand that offshore is not a regulation-free zone. There still are legal and regulatory issues offshore to consider and on which clients will need advice. Moreover, the required offshore legal advice is not simply a commoditised product for which price is the only yardstick – there are real differences between good and bad practitioners offshore the same as everywhere else."
Ogier partner Simon Schilder adds: "On the non-contentious side in the BVI we see a significant amount of transactional work, namely M&A, equity capital markets, multi-jurisdictional joint ventures and finance, mostly coming from referrals from law firms based in New York and London, but also from law firms based in the other financial centres in North America, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East.
"Our Hong Kong office typically picks up the Asian deals, where 'same timezone' convenience is key. These transactions are therefore all being led out of these centres that utilise BVI companies within their structures."
Hot sectors for the BVI include natural resources, commercial real estate, and hotels and leisure, Schilder says. "With emerging markets, the range of sectors is even wider," he explains. "For instance, earlier this year we advised Russian hypermarket chain Lenta on its IPO in London. Like Cayman, we also see a significant amount of investment fund work coming across our desk, principally hedge funds, where we advise North America and Europe-based investment managers that have opted to domicile their fund structures in the BVI.
"Contentious work coming across our dispute resolution lawyers' desks in the BVI typically involves some form of shareholder or trust dispute, or has an insolvency angle to it. Again, this dispute resolution work originates with law firms based in all the key financial centres."
Networking
Offshore firms get a significant proportion of their business via referrals from onshore law firms. Schilder points out that, as a result, the firm focuses much of its business development activity on developing and expanding its network of contacts among law firms and lawmakers in all of the major financial centres.
"Offshore firms like ours spend a considerable amount of time visiting and speaking with lawyers within onshore firms to ensure that theirs is or becomes the referral firm of choice for whichever [onshore] firm they are visiting," he says.
Recruiting onshore lawyers interested in transitioning to an offshore career is a key part of this process. "Onshore law firms take a great deal of comfort from this process since it means that our team has previously sat where they sit in the deal, and therefore are fully conversant with the bigger picture deal drivers," comments Schilder.
Nick Rogers, a partner at Ogier in the Cayman Islands, notes that offshore legal offices require much the same skills as onshore law firms: "Successful offshore lawyers need subject matter expertise, plus sufficient intelligence to absorb complex fact patterns and to articulate clear solutions. We look for outstanding client service skills, a strong work ethic and business acumen.
"People have to be able to work on their own as transactions will often be staffed with only one attorney and a partner, so they need drive. Fortunately the candidate pool tends to be self-selecting on this last requirement, as those who want to follow a conventional path don't tend to seek offshore roles."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250