Independent nation - the widening gulf between independent law firms and their global rivals
With many firms scrambling to reposition themselves for an increasingly global client base, flag planting is firmly back in fashion.
November 27, 2014 at 07:05 PM
3 minute read
With many firms scrambling to reposition themselves for an increasingly global client base, flag planting is firmly back in fashion. In the last week Eversheds chief executive Bryan Hughes has set out details of the mandate he and his management team have been given by partners to seek a US merger, while Simmons & Simmons has announced plans to open in Luxembourg.
These moves are worlds apart in terms of their significance and indeed exemplify the widening gap between those firms seeking to be global and those that are content to build more limited, international networks. But both stand in contrast to the approach of the handful of leading independents in each country that continue to pin their hopes on the effectiveness of referral relationships with like-minded firms to carry out lucrative cross-border work.
Few would contest the notion that multinational companies are demanding a greater consistency of legal advice across the world and are often consolidating their own legal teams into larger regional hubs. In response to this, firms are splitting into three camps: those seeking to be all things to all people everywhere (often via mergers), those seeking to set up their own smaller offerings in numerous locations (perhaps adding alliances in trickier regions) and a tiny number staying true to their independent roots.
Within all three of these groupings though, some firms are perhaps losing sight of a crucial ingredient for long-term success: the need for a differentiator.
While further consolidation in the commercial legal market both in the UK and internationally is inevitable, there is still room for all three types of firm to prosper. But just as many in the overcrowded UK mid-tier have already discovered that there is no room for also-rans, others will find out that bigger does not necessarily mean better globally. On the other hand, staying small without the rainmakers needed to guarantee top-tier clients is equally, if not more, perilous.
Ultimately which club firms opt to join will matter less than how they intend to distinguish themselves within it. As the articles in our independent law firm online special suggest, identifying and building on what sets them apart from the competition is essential for smaller independent firms. Whether they realise it or not, this approach will prove to be equally important for larger international firms and the global giants too. Only those firms that stand out can be successful.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRosenblatt Breaks Away From RBG, Becomes 40-Strong Standalone Firm
Eversheds Sutherland Outgoing Co-CEO to Move to Dubai to Spur Regional Growth
2 minute readMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 2PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 3Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 4'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 5'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250