Nabarro leads as Balfour Beatty rejects £1bn bid by John Laing fund for PPP assets
Nabarro took the leading role on FTSE 250 investor John Laing Infrastructure Fund's (JLIF's) failed £1bn bid for Balfour Beatty's public-private partnership (PPP) portfolio.
December 07, 2014 at 07:10 PM
2 minute read
Nabarro took the leading role on FTSE 250 investor John Laing Infrastructure Fund's (JLIF's) failed £1bn bid for Balfour Beatty's public-private partnership (PPP) portfolio.
JLIF, which is a FTSE 250 investor, offered around £1bn in cash in a non-binding proposal for Balfour Beatty's investment arm. Balfour Beatty rejected the offer on Friday (5 December), finding that it fell "significantly short of its own view of the value of the portfolio".
Nabarro advised JLIF with a team led by corporate partners Kristy Duane and Alasdair Steele.
It is not clear which firm acted for Balfour Beatty, but Linklaters regularly advises the infrastructure group on major corporate deals and sources indicated the firm was likely to have been mandated on the JLIF bid.
The magic circle firm acted for Balfour Beatty on the UK law aspects of the sale of its US professional services division to Canadian company WSP Global Inc earlier in September.
Linklaters has also represented Balfour Beatty on deals including the £190m sale of its UK facilities management business to GDF Suez Energy last year.
Nabarro is a frequent adviser to JLIF and has acted for the company on mandates including its £240m fundraising in September last year, and £39m acquisition of three private finance initiative/PPP projects from the John Laing Group in September this year.
Last year Balfour Beatty brought in Pinsent Masons as its sole adviser on the company's day-to-day legal work, with more complex M&A and litigation work handled by its legal panel, which includes Linklaters as well as Eversheds, Berwin Leighton Paisner and Allen & Overy.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Jones Day and Wachtell Lead on Anglo American's $3.8B Coal Business Sale
2 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readThe Law Firms Generating 8-Figure Fees on the Year's Big Ticket UK Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250