White & Case Moscow headcount drops 15% since Ukraine sanctions
In a further sign of the difficulties facing international law firms in Moscow, White & Case has seen a 15% fall in its office headcount in just over seven months.
December 08, 2014 at 07:13 PM
3 minute read
In a further sign of the difficulties facing international law firms in Moscow, White & Case has seen a 15% fall in its office headcount in just over seven months.
Two partners and two associates have relocated to London since May, while a further six associates who have left the Moscow base have not been replaced. In total, 10 of the 67 White & Case lawyers stationed in Moscow at the end of April have now left the office.
Since then, capital markets practice head Darina Lozovsky has relocated to London on a temporary basis, while M&A partner Jonathan Langley has returned to the City after three years in Russia.
Legal Week understands White & Case decided not to replace any of the six associates who left the firm, with some moving to in-house roles and at least one associate on a fixed-term contract which was not renewed.
A counsel, Chris O'Donnell, has also been placed on a leave of absence, according to the firm's website.
"White & Case has built a strong, top-tier practice in Russia since opening an office in Moscow almost 25 years ago," said a spokesperson.
"Following the imposition of sanctions, it's clear that market conditions in Russia have changed and we are monitoring the situation very closely. We remain committed to our Russia practice in the long term and will continue advising clients on a wide range of matters."
The firm did not say whether it expected to relocate any other lawyers, or allow for further natural attrition.
In September, Legal Week reported how a number of top US and UK firms were reshaping or repositioning their Russian practices in the wake of the Ukraine crisis.
Firms are re-pivoting transactional teams towards Asia and downsizing or relocating junior lawyers to other offices since the US and EU began imposing sanctions on Russia in the summer.
A number of firms including Skadden have reviewed their approach to advising clients affected by the sanctions, which have prohibited a number of corporates and banks from accessing European or US capital markets.
Like White & Case, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton – which is also one of the main legal advisers to the Russian Government – has allowed the total numbers of lawyers in its Moscow office "to decline somewhat by natural attrition".
Meanwhile, Linklaters has responded by introducing a programme of intra-office secondments, with at least five associates from the magic circle firm's Moscow relocated to London and elsewhere in the firm's network since May.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHong Kong IPO Market Shows Signs of Slow but Steady Recovery
Mexico's Judicial Reforms and the Implications for Foreign Investors
5 minute readWhite & Case, Clifford Chance, Ibrahim & Partners Advise on LuLu Retail's Abu Dhabi IPO
3 minute read'The Progression Is Not Natural': As IPOs Surge in India, Law Firms Try to Keep Up
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250