DLA Piper and Hogan Lovells only two firms to win FCA report work 18 months after panel set up
DLA Piper and Hogan Lovells are the only two law firms to have so far won work after being appointed to the 'Skilled Person' panel set up by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) last April.
December 10, 2014 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
DLA Piper and Hogan Lovells are the only two law firms to have so far won work after being appointed to the 'Skilled Person' panel set up by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) last April.
The FCA can commission reports from designated 'skilled persons'. including law firms, when the regulator has concerns about a financial firm's activities or wants further analysis. But of the 77 reports commissioned between April last year and September 2014, only four were put together by law firms.
DLA acted on two in the second quarter of the 2013-14 financial year – one involving client assets concerns and one relating to a conduct of business inquiry – while Hogan Lovells picked up one commission in the second quarter of 2014-15 for a report into conduct of business issues.
In the first quarter of the 2013-14 financial year, Macfarlanes also completed a report into conduct of business concerns, but it is understood that the instruction predates the firm winning a spot on the panel.
The investigations can be conducted into a variety of financial institutions, for example insurance companies, credit unions and personal investment businesses, but the most common type of firm to be put under review was banks, who saw 26 skilled person investigations levied at them over the period by the regulator.
The skilled person reviews can look at, among other things, governance, controls and risk management frameworks, conduct of business and financial crime.
Seven law firms were originally appointed to the panel, which will extends to March 2017: Ashurst, Clifford Chance (CC), DLA Piper, Eversheds, Hogan Lovells, Macfarlanes and Pannone.
However, a number of accountancy, risk management and consultancy firms also won spots and have since dominated the market. Deloitte took the most mandates with 11 in the first 18 months of the panel, followed by Grant Thornton with 9 and KPMG with 8.
"It's obviously great to be on the panel, but because of the tendering process you can lose out to the accountants because they can undercut the law firms" said a partner at one of the firms on the panel. "I'm a bit sceptical about how many firms are going for the work now."
The FCA did go off panel once over the period, approving Welsh accountants Broomfield & Alexander Advisors to conduct a review "due to exceptional circumstances in a regulated firm."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250