Stephenson Harwood forms alliance with PRC outfit in Guangzhou
Stephenson Harwood has formed an alliance with one of the former PRC partners from its Guangzhou office shortly after closing the base.
December 10, 2014 at 12:27 AM
3 minute read
Stephenson Harwood has formed an alliance with one of the former PRC lawyers from its Guangzhou office shortly after closing the base.
The UK firm, which shut its doors in the South China city in September in a bid to re-evaluate its China practice, has tied-up with the newly formed firm Wei Tu, run by ex-Stephenson Harwood lawyer Xianming Lu.
The venture will see the two firms working collaboratively on China projects, but will prevent them from sharing profits or brand name.
Since leaving Stephenson Harwood, Lu has been able to reactivate his PRC practice license, allowing him to once again advise on all PRC law matters, including tax and litigation.
Two other lawyers who previously worked with Lu at Stephenson Harwood's Guangzhou base are also expected to join the firm.
Voon Keat Lai, managing partner of Stephenson Harwood in Greater China, told Legal Week that the model was more logical for the UK firm in light of the difficulties hiring and expanding in Guangzhou and the fact that much of the work is local.
"We felt there were limitations to what we could in Guangzhou as Stephenson Harwood, so we thought better to vacate that market and work with people that we know," he said.
"Guangzhou is a very large legal market but also very localised. We were having difficulty finding ways of expanding because we couldn't attract the right types of candidates – most are PRC qualified.
"It is also not a financial centre like Beijing and Shanghai. It's an operational centre where you have a lot of factories. Issues tend to be local law issues. M&A and big investment decisions not likely to be made in Guangzhou but elsewhere."
Going forward he made clear the firm would be interested in a closer relationship with Wei Tu under the 2003 Hong Kong-China Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA), which permits a Hong Kong outfit and a China firm to formally collaborate, share office space and participate in joint marketing activities.
The rules now additionally allow firms to form a joint venture and share profits, though the PRC firm has to have the controlling stake.
The Guangzhou firm also has to have been established for one year. Hong Kong firms are permitted to have up to three partner firms in total.
"In time we would like to consider a CEPA arrangement with them, but at this moment it's out of reach," added Lai.
"[Forming JVs in China is] not easy. You have to have a firm that is pretty close to you. We want to enter arrangements with firms that we're comfortable with. We need to see changes in how the PRC law firms work for us to have comfortable relationships with them."
Stephenson Harwood currently has 19 partners across its Beijing, Shanghai and Hong Kong offices, three of whom are on the mainland.
It recently hired Clyde & Co partner Lynia Lau to manage the Beijing base, and is hoping to add four senior lawyers in Shanghai in the near future.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250