The Legal Week guide to the UK's best legal employers
If law firm brochures are to be believed, life as a solicitor at a top commercial law firm could not be more fulfilling. The truth is somewhat different. Working at the coalface of commercial law can be tough, and the reality is that some firms are better than others at looking after their staff.
December 10, 2014 at 07:40 AM
5 minute read
If law firm brochures are to be believed, life as a solicitor at a top firm could not be more fulfilling. The truth is somewhat different. Working at the coalface of commercial law can be tough, and the reality is that some firms are better than others at looking after their staff.
Every year Legal Week Intelligence sets out to identify the law firms that have the most satisfied fee earners by publishing the results of our annual Employee Satisfaction Survey – a comprehensive, profession-wide survey of fee earners. Respondents are canvassed on the most important factors affecting their working lives and how their expectations are being met at their firms. They are asked about the quality of work they undertake, their treatment by partners, career opportunities, the prestige of their own firms and the other firms they most admire.
In 2014 the survey received almost 3,000 replies from lawyers at the UK top 100 and the 20 largest international/US firms in London. In recognition of the work being done by firms to improve satisfaction levels, Legal Week Intelligence provides a Best Legal Employer accreditation to those firms that record the highest scores and engage with the findings, which are published in the Employee Satisfaction Report. To receive an accreditation, law firms must be placed among the top performers in one of two categories: UK law firms and global law firms.
The following firms have been named ESR 2014 Best Legal Employers – click on the links below to read a summary of their results.
Burges Salmon has retained its place in the top 10 UK firms for employee satisfaction, scoring highly for quality of work, support services and strength of brand – click here for more information.
DWF made an impressive showing in the 2014 Employee Satisfaction Report, with its staff speaking positively about the firm's work quality and client quality – click here for more information.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has always had a strong reputation with an impressive array of global clients, but which areas are its employees most happy with? Click here for more information.
As in last year's report, Reed Smith's fee earners rated their office environment very highly, while the firm is also comfortably above average in other key areas – click here for more information.
Weil Gotshal & Manges claims the prize of the most highly ranked global firm of the 22 ranked this year – what is it that makes this firm stand out? Click here for more information.
RPC's employees believe the firm delivers a career with a good work-life balance, while other factors cited by staff include quality of clients and quality of work – click here for more information.
Shoosmiths maintains its lead position in this year's rankings, scoring above the national average across the board. To find out why the firm ranks so highly – click here for more information.
Of all the UK firms in this report, Withers rates the highest for fee earner interaction with clients. Other standout scores include work and client quality and prestige – click here for more information.
As one survey respondent puts it: "There does seem to be a Weightmans kind of person, as everyone gets on really well and there is a good atmosphere." Click here for more information.
—————————————————————————————————————————-
In this video, Legal Week director of research Des Cahill and news editor Gavriel Hollander look at which firms are best at keeping their staff happy.
For further information on the Best Legal Employer accreditation and having your firm profiled, please <a href="email Lara Rosenthal or call: +44 (0)20 7316 9864 .
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250