School-leavers set for six year apprenticeship route into law
School-leavers may be able to qualify on the job as solicitors in six years under new draft assessment plans drawn up by the steering committee behind the government-backed Trailblazer apprenticeship in law scheme.
December 15, 2014 at 07:38 PM
4 minute read
School-leavers may be able to qualify on the job as solicitors in six years under new draft assessment plans drawn up by the steering committee behind the government-backed Trailblazer apprenticeship in law scheme.
Confirmation of the assessment plans brings the apprenticeship route to qualification a step closer to introduction, with the committee also deciding assessment criteria for the proposed chartered legal executive and paralegal apprenticeships. The legal executive apprenticeship would last five years and the paralegal option two.
The plans have been devised with close involvement from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in order to ensure standards for all three apprenticeships mirror existing regulatory requirements.
Proposals will be submitted to the Department of Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) in February 2015, with the Trailblazer group hoping that the solicitor apprenticeship will launch in 2017 – a year after the paralegal and chartered legal executive options.
In response to the on-going consultations a number of firms involved in the process are already reviewing their training structures, with some, such as Addleshaw Goddard, stating they plan to adopt the solicitor apprenticeships once approved.
Training providers including BPP and the University of Law are also involved in the consultations, with the expectation that they will develop materials for the formal training aspects of the apprenticeships.
Employers will be able to choose which provider they want to work with and tailor the apprenticeship around their needs.
"The trailblazer steering group is happy with the progress we have made to date and we feel we are on track to meet our next BIS deadline in February," said steering group chair and Addleshaws resourcing manager, Gun Judge. "We're grateful for the support we've had from the providers and employers. "
The assessment for the solicitor apprenticeship will consist of formative testing throughout the apprenticeship and a final summative assessment.
The two-part summative assessment will be completed in the final six months of the apprenticeship and evaluated by an independent body assigned by the SRA.
The first part will be a multiple choice test covering a wide range of areas including the legal system of England and Wales, contract law and professional conduct and regulation.
The second part of the assessment: objective structured practical legal exercises (OSPLE) will test a number of key competencies including interview and advising, advocacy, drafting and legal research.
The on the job assessments will be decided by each employer but will have to be based around key progression milestones identified by the steering group.
Individuals may be able to bypass some areas of the formative assessment if they have previous experience or relevant qualifications.
The draft proposals recommend a wide band of entry requirements for the solicitor apprenticeship with five GCSEs and three A-Levels the suggested minimum, though each firm or in-house department will be able to set their own entry requirements.
Funding for all three of the new apprenticeships is expected to work on a contribution system with both the employer and the government paying in. Government contributions will apply to apprentices who are aged 16-18 when they start their apprenticeship.
Exact costs of each of the apprenticeships will be decided by the employers and training providers.
Salaries for apprenticeship will be at the discretion of employers but they must be paid at least minimum wage.
A number of firms and in-house legal tearms sit on the steering committee for the Trailblazers in law scheme, which is part of a wider government led initiative to boost diversity in a number of professions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBarclays restructures legal team ahead of ringfencing reforms
Barclays restructures legal team ahead of ringfencing reforms
Barclays restructures legal team ahead of ringfencing reforms
Barclays restructures legal team ahead of ringfencing reforms
Trending Stories
- 1Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 2Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 3Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
- 4People in the News—Dec. 2, 2024—Marshall Dennehey, Pollock Begg
- 5How I Made Partner: 'Prioritize What Is Important to You, Do What Energizes You,' Says Sarah Wellings of Sullivan & Worcester
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250