BLP profits recover by 25% during 2013-14 as Lawyers On Demand sees 10% turnover growth
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) shrunk its net debt by 15% during the 2013-14 financial year, with the reduction coming alongside a 25% increase in operating profit.
January 05, 2015 at 08:36 AM
4 minute read
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) shrunk its net debt by 15% during the 2013-14 financial year, with the reduction coming alongside a 25% increase in operating profit.
The figures, which are contained in accounts recently filed with Companies House, show BLP reduced net debt by £5.3m to £29.2m, with the drop following a sharp rise in debt levels during 2012-13, up 134% from £14.8m to £34.6m.
The accounts also show BLP's operating profit increased by 25% from £55.2m to £69.1m during 2013-14, with profit available for distribution among members up by 27% from £52.3m to £66.2m. The firm released unaudited figures last May stating a 35% boost in profit per equity partner to £542,000.
During the first half of 2013 BLP cut 58 legal roles and 44 secretarial jobs as part of a major redundancy round. The LLP filings show overall employee headcount fell by 9% to 1,204, with the number of legal staff dipping 7% from 662 to 615 and support staff numbers falling 10.5% to 589. The number of LLP members also fell, from 179 in April 2013 to 167 the following year.
At the time BLP said it would make a 15% reduction in total salary costs as a result of the layoffs. However, the LLP accounts show salary costs decreased by 4% from £90.7m to £87.1m, with overall staff costs rising by almost 1% due to an increase in "other staff costs" from £3.9m to £9.3m.
BLP said the underlying saving in staff costs in London – excluding international offices – stood at 9%. Also, as the redundancy programme happened over the summer, only nine months of the savings are included in the statutory accounts, so full year savings would be higher.
The firm's highest paid member's earnings in 2013-14 were broadly static with the previous year at £1.2m. Members made total capital contributions of £6.8m during the year, up from £5.6m in 2013.
The accounts also show that BLP's flexible working spin-off Lawyers on Demand (LoD) issued loan stock of £2.45m to BLP in December 2013. After BLP spun off the business, the company financed the acquisition through a £2.65m loan from BLP alongside a £100,000 investment from shareholders. Last year LOD paid off £200,000 of the capital and roughly £400,000 of accrued interest.
Separate accounts filed by LOD show the business increased turnover by 10% between 22 March 2012 to the end of April 2013, from £7.9m to £8.7m, a rise attributed to an "improved mix of client base", which currently comprises corporates, financial institutions and UK law firms.
LOD's operating profit, however, dropped by 40% from £724,000 to £408,000, which was attributed to "continued investment in the business". Profit for the year after tax was £142,000, down 17% on the previous year's figure of £172,000.
LOD co-founder Simon Harper said the figures were impacted by the launches of its 'pay-as-you-go' operation LOD On Call and its transaction teams service during the year.
Harper added: "The investments made during this period are already paying dividends in the current financial year with substantial […] growth being seen. Growth this year is around 40% and the new service lines are already accounting for more than 20% of turnover."
Directors' remuneration at the business grew by 72.3% to £486,000 excluding pension contributions, while the highest paid director took home £237,000. Staff costs increased from £816,000 to £1.07m, with employee wages and salaries growing from £704,000 to £895,000.
Net debt was reduced from £2.28m to £1.48m, while cash at bank and in hand increased from £664,000 to £1.08m.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250