Fried Frank to close Hong Kong and Shanghai offices
US firm chair tells Asia staff of plans to close offices with relocations on the cards. Firm may keep service centre in Hong Kong.
January 19, 2015 at 11:19 AM
2 minute read
Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson is set to close its Hong Kong and Shanghai offices, with the US firm announcing plans to shut down the bases by 30 June.
Employees at both offices are in discussions about possible relocations after chairman David Greenwald visited the region last week to tell staff about the planned closures. Fried Frank currently has four partners, eight associates, two of counsel and 18 staff in Hong Kong, while its Shanghai outpost has one permanent member of staff.
The firm is considering keeping some kind of service centre in Hong Kong as well as its China licence to practise.
"You can be assured that the decision to reduce our commitment in this region was not taken lightly, particularly since we continue to believe in the long term prospects of Asia," Greenwald wrote in an internal memo to staff.
"However, after reviewing our overall performance in this region and the current opportunities, we concluded that our growth potential in Asia was not sufficiently attractive from a commercial perspective without significant additional investment, and the governance committee determined that it is not the time to increase our investment in this region."
News of the closures comes after Legal Week reported in 2013 that Fried Frank was significantly downsizing in the region, roughly halving its previous 12,000 sq ft of office space in Hong Kong amid a number of departures.
At that time Victoria Lloyd, who had joined in 2007 from Simmons & Simmons, left for Ropes & Gray, while corporate partner Joshua Wechsler moved from the firm's Hong Kong office to New York.
In March last year, Fried Frank made up one partner in Hong Kong, litigation lawyer Alfred Wu. The firm's three other partners in the city are all corporate specialists: Doug Freeman, Victor Chen and Carolyn Sng.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Bolsters Singapore Offering With A&O Shearman Hire
Reed Smith Hires DLA Piper’s Former Equity Capital Markets Partner in Hong Kong
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
- 2Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
- 3Spoliation Sanctions
- 4At FDA, Flavored Vape Products Go Up In Smoke
- 5Arguing Class Actions: CAFA’s Local Controversy Exception
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250