Merger plans: 95% of managing partners predict major consolidation in next two years
Law firm leaders expect more tie-ups despite only 43% of those from merged firms thinking most recent unions have been successful
January 27, 2015 at 08:16 AM
3 minute read
Ninety-five per cent of managing partners at the UK's leading law firms predict major consolidation at the top end of the legal sector over the next two years, a survey of more than 100 of the UK's top 200 law firms shows.
Increased competition, client expectations, the requirement for growth and enhancement of reputation are the forces increasingly driving top UK law firms into the arms of merger partners, the research by Byfield Consultancy and partnership specialists Fox Williams indicates, with 45% of firms that have not yet merged saying they would consider a tie-up within two years.
This comes despite the majority of respondents from merged firms (57%) saying most mergers taking place over the last five years had not been successful. Those from merged firms said the function they would most like to have improved around the time of integration was internal communications.
The results indicate that law firm bosses tend to go it alone when it comes to seeking out a merger partner though. Only 6% of merged firms said they had instructed external lawyers for merger advice, while just 16% of merged firm respondents confirmed they engaged a third-party broker to approach a prospective merger partner.
At an event to launch the study this morning (27 January), legacy Speechly Bircham managing partner, now Charles Russell Speechlys managing partner James Carter (pictured, left), said the key was to "be honest" with firms management talk to.
"If there are partners or practice areas that just aren't good enough, don't kid the other firm…It's very easy to say that the other firm does something different from us, so it can't be right, but there are loads of historical reasons why people work or budget differently, and you need to understand that."
Growth was singled out over financial stability as the principal driver for merging by both merged and non-merged firm respondents , with 81% and 73% respectively citing it as a key reason for linking up.
"Economies of scale at best pay for the cost of the merger over one to two years," said Carter. "If you are going into a merger looking for cost savings you aren't going to get what you want; it should be about the top line."
Gus Sellitto, managing director of Byfield Consultancy, also predicted more three way mergers in the future.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRopes & Gray Registers Paris Services Company Amid Talk of France Office Launch
2 minute readPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
DLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250