Why it's unfair to slate Dentons' ambitious China merger
The firm's tie-up with the regions's largest law firm has attracted unjustified criticism
January 30, 2015 at 05:51 AM
3 minute read
Let's be honest, in recent years, in the UK at least, Dentons-bashing has been a pretty easy sport. Yes, in the space of five years the firm had gone from also-ran US player and struggling UK mid-tier to one of the largest in the world by headcount and a top 20 player by revenue – but that didn't stop the sniping.
Issues around profitability and questions about the level of integration and whether bigger really is better persisted, with opinion not necessarily helped by the firm's controversial decision to abandon reporting average profits per equity partner last year.
Earlier this week Dentons formally signed its merger with China's Dacheng. The tie-up with the region's largest law firm has more than doubled the size of Dentons to make it the biggest law firm in the world by headcount – even if Dacheng's revenues and, inevitably, revenue per lawyer (RPL) are a long way off Dentons' own figures.
Is this enough to stop the sniping? Well, not entirely, it turns out. Managing partners in the UK have raised questions about why anyone would want 4,000 lawyers in China, while others in the UK and Asia have questioned the quality of Dacheng.
But credit where it's due. China's economic output last year of $10.3trn (£6.8trn) is only bettered by that of the US and represented a five-fold increase over the last decade. The number of economically important cities in China will keep growing and Dentons now has greater access to these cities than any other western law firm. And while Dacheng may have been more focused on domestically facing clients than legacy King & Wood, King & Wood Mallesons' Chinese arm, the speed of development within China means that many of these clients are broadening their horizons.
If Dentons were trying to be Sullivan & Cromwell in every jurisdiction around the world it would clearly have failed in its mission for global domination. But it isn't. The firm effectively wants to be local, globally, with a strong brand around the world and decent profitability.
Against this ambition, it is hard to knock this latest deal. As the firm prepares to announce strong financial results for 2014, its management is keen to argue that criticism is inevitable for a firm daring to be different. Criticism would be more than justified if Dentons' Swiss verein unravels, if its financial performance dips or if its RPL falls. But knocking its ambition is unfair.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRosenblatt Breaks Away From RBG, Becomes 40-Strong Standalone Firm
Eversheds Sutherland Outgoing Co-CEO to Move to Dubai to Spur Regional Growth
2 minute readMore than Half of South Australian Lawyers Report Suffering Harassment
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250