Addleshaw Goddard's net debt climbs as operating profit falls
Firm's accounts show net debt climb 22% as operating profit fell 4% and staff costs rose as CMS Cameron McKenna sees 10-fold increase in cash at bank and in hand
February 04, 2015 at 06:58 AM
2 minute read
Addleshaw Goddard's net debt climbed to £17.5m during the last financial year, according to accounts filed with Companies House which also show operating profit falling 4%, despite a slight uptick in turnover.
The firm's accounts show net debt climbed 22% during the year ending 30 April 2014 from £14.3m to £17.5m, with the firm having drawn down £18m of bank loans compared with £17m the previous year.
At 1 May 2014 net debt stood at £14.3m compared with £12.1m the previous year.
The accounts for the firm's UK operations show the firm reported operating profit of £52.1m, down from £54.3m in the 2012-13 financial year. Turnover climbed 1.7%, from £164.4m to £167.2m, but this was offset by a £5m increase in total operating expenses, up to £115.1m from £110.1m.
Total staff costs rose from £55.2m to £57m as the number of fee earners at the firm increased from 595 to 641 and the number of support staff rose from 383 to 401.
The highest paid partner received £558,564, excluding retirement provisions, down from £583,173 the previous financial year.
Capital contributions from partners dropped from £6.1m to £5.6m.
The firm's unaudited results for 2013-14 announced earlier this year put full firm revenue at £171.4m against a 14.2% dip in profit per equity partner to £392,000.
The accounts also list a £1.37m operating charge for expense payments to alliance firms Francis & Co (Hong Kong) and a further £566,000 in expense payments to Nasser Al Habsi & Saif Al Mamari Law Firm (Oman).
CMS Cameron McKenna also released its accounts for the 2013-2014 financial year this week, showing a more than 10-fold increase in cash at bank and in hand, which grew from £2.6m to £27.9m prior to its merger with Dundas & Wilson in May 2014.
The highest paid member of the LLP received £1.27m, including an early retirement provision of £593,000, up from the highest package in the 2013 financial year of £1.1m.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 2Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 3FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
- 4'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
- 5Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250