Mayhew's appointment is a boost for both BLP and the legal profession
Election result means Mayhew joins a small but growing group of women leading top City law firms
February 06, 2015 at 04:18 AM
3 minute read
Earlier this week Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) elected its first ever female managing partner. The vote of confidence in Lisa Mayhew means she joins the small but growing band of women at the helm of a leading City law firm.
Within the UK top 20, she and Herbert Smith Freehills' Sonya Leydecker are the only females holding managing partner/chief executive roles, with Addleshaw Goddard's Monica Burch joining the table when taking into consideration the more ambassadorial senior partner position.
Beyond this, in the top 30 there is CMS Cameron McKenna senior partner Penelope Warne, Stephenson Harwood CEO Sharon White and Withers managing director Margaret Robertson.
Assuming each top 30 firm has both a managing partner/CEO and a senior partner/chairman, you're talking about 60 available positions, with women holding six of them. On one hand, just 10% of senior leadership roles being held by women is a dreadful statistic given the numbers that enter the profession at the junior end. On the other, advocates for change will be encouraged by the fact that three of these appointments have been made since last May and the bulk in the last five years – suggesting the trend is gathering pace.
In the case of BLP, it is hopefully a sign of a firm putting into practice what it preaches and being willing to change. In Mayhew the firm has elected a partner who only joined in 2010 to succeed one of the most longstanding law firm managers around – a fact that is far more surprising than her gender, and indicative of an openness to new ideas that it would arguably be hard to find elsewhere. (Charlie Geffen's ousting aside, how often are law firm election results that surprising?)
And it's hard to think of a better way in which the firm could have shown its commitment to the gender diversity targets it set last autumn – to have a 30% female partnership by 2018. Assuming Mayhew is given the power that should come with her new title, and is not overshadowed by outgoing managing partner Neville Eisenberg in a yet to be confirmed new role, her appointment should be seen as a huge positive both for the firm and the legal sector.
Quotas and targets are a controversial topic – of course people should only be given positions they deserve and are capable of. Drawing further attention to what remains a significant problem in the profession and providing tangible examples of how it can be rectified, though, can only be a good thing.
- For more, see: Berwin Leighton Paisner elects first female managing partner
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Risk of Losing Out on Great Talent': Data Shows Ethnic Diversity Continues to Lag at Major Law Firms
7 minute readOrigination Credit, Relationship Partner Succession May Be Mansfield Rule's Next Frontiers
A Law Firm Divided: How Generational Differences Are Fracturing Firms
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250