As Freshfields looks to Manchester, can top law firms ignore the nearshoring stampede?
Pressure for top firms to open UK low cost centres mounts as Freshfields begins search for 100,000 sq ft Manchester base
February 15, 2015 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
"If you had told me six months ago that Freshfields was going to open in Manchester, I would have been slightly amazed."
That's the verdict of the outsourcing centre chief at a top 20 firm on Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's plans to open a new low-cost base in Manchester.
Freshfields outlined its plans in an internal memo to staff on 9 February. It is aiming to relocate some back office staff to Manchester by the second half of this year, a move that will kick off a phased expansion in the city that will see some lower cost legal work being handled there by 2018.
The extent of the firm's ambition for its new Manchester base is underlined by the fact it is looking for 80,000-100,000 sq ft of office space. By way of comparison, CMS Cameron McKenna's new Cannon Street office will take up 130,000 sq ft.
According to Estates Gazette, potential locations include One and Two St Peter's Square, Allied London's Cotton Building, Ask Developments' 101 Embankment, English Cities Fund's One New Bailey and NOMA's Hanover Building as the firm looks to cash in on rents that average about half the cost of London real estate.
It is understood that the firm is not ruling out some redundancies as a result of its plans.
"Just like all of us [Freshfields] are doing what the client wants," comments Alan Greenough, who is heading up the low cost centre Hogan Lovells set up in Birmingham last year. "All top law firms need to reduce their cost base."
Freshfields' decision to choose Manchester as its base reinforces the impression that the current trend is for law firms to locate their low cost centres within easy striking distance of London.
Although rents are obviously lower in Manchester than London, the firm has eschewed the subsidies snapped up by the first wave of firms to go down the nearshoring route; Ashurst, which set up shop in Glasgow, and Herbert Smith Freehills and Allen & Overy (A&O), which opened bases in Northern Ireland, the latter firm receiving the not insubstantial sum of £2.5m from Invest Northern Ireland in exchange for the 300 jobs it created for its Belfast support centre launch in 2011.
If Freshfields' ambitions for Manchester were purely confined to back office functions, it might have also made more sense to pick a location such as India, as Clifford Chance did in 2006, where labour costs are a fraction of those in UK.
"It must be possible [to set up a legal support centre offshore] but it inevitably introduces different challenges into the equation," says Barry Gross, who heads the low cost office opened in Manchester by Berwin Leighton Paisner last year. "Simply getting on a train to go to Manchester and engaging with the staff is much easier than getting on a plane."
Gross predicts an initial squeeze on the market in terms of available talent, but that this will be offset by more lawyers coming into Manchester given the attraction of big names like Freshfields.
"Historically, lawyers have thought if they wanted to do the best work and if they wanted to do the best deals they needed to be in London," he says. "But you could see people starting to consider in more detail moves away from London… there's potential for a better work/life balance."
Given the frequency of nearshoring announcements – with Latham & Watkins announcing its own plans for Manchester just last month - soon commentators will be expressing amazement when a top firm announces that it won't be expanding into one of the UK's regional centres.
Related:
A shore thing? What in-house lawyers think about law firm near-shoring
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250