Submission deadline for Legal Innovation Awards extended
Requests for extensions prompts decision to extend deadline to 27 March for all in order to create a level playing field
March 19, 2015 at 07:40 AM
2 minute read
The deadline for submissions for the inaugural Legal Week Legal Innovation Awards has been extended by a week to 27 March.
The move follows several requests for deadline extensions and creates a level playing field for those law firms, legal departments and chambers still preparing their submissions.
The Legal Innovation Awards, which will take place in London on 22 May, are targeted at teams and individuals in non fee earning roles who are playing a leading role in driving forward their businesses.
Key awards include Marketing, Business Development and Communications Innovation, which reflects the crucial role business development and communications teams play in winning business and growing law firm brands, and International Innovation, which underlines the importance of integrating multi-office networks in order to ensure clients receive a consistent service.
There are also awards covering diversity, green initiatives, knowledge management and compliance. See below for a full list of the categories.
The independent judging panel includes former CC senior partner Stuart Popham (pictured), vice chairman of banking for Europe at Citi, Paul Philip, chief executive of the Solicitors Regulation Authority, Oonagh Harpur, a non-executive director at The Treasury Solicitor's Department, and Dame Janet Gaymer.
The shortlist will be announced on 3 April and the awards will be presented at a lunchtime ceremony at the Jumeirah Carlton Tower hotel in London on 22 May.
For entry enquiries email [email protected] or call her on +44 (0)207 316 9406 .
For sponsorship opportunities call Colin Logan on 0207 316 9867 or email [email protected].
Click here for details on how to enter
The full list of categories are as follows:
The Outstanding Innovator Award
Future of Legal Services Innovation
Marketing, Business Development and Communications Innovation
Recruitment Innovation
Diversity Innovation
International Innovation
Client Management Innovation
Knowledge Management Innovation
Compliance and KYC Innovation
Supplier Innovation
Pro Bono Innovation
Next Generation Innovation
Chambers Innovation
Green Innovation
Mobile and Flexible Working Innovation
Benefits and Incentives Innovation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
GCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
A Dark Future of Deepfakes and Disobedient AI: What GCs Foresee For 2050
3 minute read
Shein GC's Responses to Supply Chain Questions 'Bordered on Contempt', Say Lawmakers
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
