'You need to have the skin of a rhinoceros' - Janet Day on 40 years at the legal IT coalface
The great and the good of the legal IT community were out in force this February for a reception to mark the retirement of Janet Day as director of IT at Berwin Leighton Paisner...
April 15, 2015 at 07:23 AM
4 minute read
The great and the good of the legal IT community were out in force this February for a reception to mark the retirement of Janet Day as director of IT at Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP).
Day, who has spent her entire career in the legal sector, started out at Allen & Overy (A&O) in 1970, initially as secretary to then senior partner Jim Thomson, before joining the IT department.
As a result, she was at the coalface when legal IT made its first inroads into the legal profession in the early 1980s, when A&O installed its first mainframe computer and replaced typewriters with word processors.
Reflecting on her career, she says of the key attributes of successful IT directors: "You need to have the skin of a rhinoceros, as there will always be people who say it won't work.
"You also need an eye for detail, and you have to have to have the sales capability – the belief that what you are doing will work and the ability to sell that conviction to your team." (pictured L-R: IT journalist Joanna Goodman; Emma Sarson, BigHand; Lesley Hills, Allen & Overy; Janet Day; Jan DeCerce, director of IT and operations, Lewis Silkin; Bruna Pellicci, global IT director, Ashurst)
Among the attendees at the reception, which was organised by Day's BLP colleague Jane Livesey, was Jan DeCerce, director of IT and operations at Lewis Silkin. "The Janet Day the world knows is the lady who made it okay for other women to head up the IT function in what was – and some may think still is – a man's domain; and who always, no matter what, had a view on all things legal IT. The Janet Day I know is a very supportive, loyal and dear friend who I hope will remain so for many years to come," says DeCerce.
Although Day spent a period mid-career as an IT consultant, she is best known within the IT community as BLP's IT director, having joined legacy firm Berwin Leighton six years before its merger in 2001 with Paisner & Co to create BLP.
Over time, the merger came to be regarded as one of the most successful UK law firm combinations as it proved the catalyst for a period of rapid expansion under the stewardship of Neville Eisenberg, who was recently voted in as senior partner after completing a 16-year stint as managing partner.
Day recalls the period running up to the merger as being frantic but ultimately rewarding.
"There were five weeks between the vote and all of the systems going live – everyone had to be moved onto the same systems and have the same phone number and email address. I've never worked harder in my life. But we agreed what we needed to do and how to do it and set about doing it."
Having stepped down from her full-time role, Day will continue to retain an interest both in BLP and legal tech. She is chair of the Adelaide Group, the networking group she established at her old firm for its female lawyers and their clients, and she is also a judge for the inaugural Legal Innovation Awards, which are hosted by Legal Week and take place in London on 22 May.
And, no doubt, she will be keeping a close eye on developments in legal IT. "There will be an increasing emphasis on security as the people who are snooping become more sophisticated," she predicts. "And I believe advances in artificial intelligence will have a major impact on the profession."
(pictured L-R: Stuart Walters, global IT director, Olswang; David Wood, head of business projects, BLP; Janet Day and husband Stuart; Anthony Barrett, of nQueue Billback)
The Legal Innovation Awards will recognise the people driving the profession forward by applying imagination and ingenuity – click here to view the shortlist.
- This year's Strategic Technology Forum will focus on processes and the role IT plays in driving law firms towards their strategic goals – click here for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1King & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
- 2Nation's Largest Utility Parts Ways With CLO Who Helped It Navigate Bribery Scandal
- 3Advocates Renew Campaign for Immigrant Right to Counsel in New York
- 4From ‘Unregulated’ to ‘A Matter of Great Concern’: PFAS Regulation under Biden
- 5Public Interest Lawyers in NY Fear Rollback of Federal Loan Assistance in '25, Ask Gov. to Add $4M to State Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250