'I dream of Bakers leading the global elite' – Eduardo Leite outlines plans for further international expansion
After announcing its joint operation in China with FenXun Partners, the firm's global chair explains why there's still more to do
April 22, 2015 at 01:24 PM
4 minute read
With Baker & McKenzie having just announced its joint operation in China with domestic firm FenXun Partners, global chair Eduardo Leite cut a very happy figure at the firm's EMEA partner conference in Prague last week.
The joint operation licence, which is governed under the law of the Shanghai free-trade zone, allows the firm to advise clients on Chinese law under its own name by working alongside FenXun's 20 lawyers, though the staff will remain on the payroll of their respective firms.
But it's not the only approach to one of the world's biggest emerging legal markets. You only have to look at Dentons' mega-merger with 4,000-lawyer outfit Dacheng, announced in January, to find a radical alternative to Bakers' small cooperative ethos. Meanwhile, others have opted to maintain looser arrangements with local firms rather than tie themselves to one partner.
Leite is convinced that it is Bakers' model that will win out. "The joint agreement works all over China," he says. "And the Shanghai free-trade zone is the pilot for similar zones across China.
"The size is not what really matters, but the offering of the firm. Our clients want us to have the best talent in the right jurisdictions."
You can't help thinking that he has rival US giant Dentons in mind when he goes a step further and argues that the process of bolting on a smaller partner will be smoother than undertaking a mega-merger. "You have to work hard to combine two big firms but with FenXun that collaboration is there [from the start] and that is very noticeable," he explains. "From day one we are in the same building."
In addition to sharing an office under the joint operation, lawyers from FenXun will be seconded to other areas of the business as part of Bakers' existing transfer programme.
Leite sees the deal as one of the keys to ensuring that Bakers – which reported record global revenue of $2.5bn (£1.7bn) last year, up by 5% on the year before – remains in the "global elite". He, like many in the industry, foresees the market polarising into global giants and local minnows, and he is keen that Bakers remains in the former camp – though given that last year it was the largest global law firm by revenue it would have to fall some distance to reach the latter group.
"The global elite is already taking shape and there is going to be a group of anything between 10 and 20 very large and powerful multi-practice firms," Leite predicts. "Our platform is already there."
Laying the groundwork for further expansion into China is in keeping with the firm's trajectory in recent years. Last July it opened an office in Brisbane, Australia, and in the 12 months before that it launched bases in Yangon in Myanmar and Dubai.
Leite is keen to point out that he is still looking to further expand the reach of the business. "We may be present in nearly 50 countries but we have clients that do business in 180 jurisdictions so we obviously have a long way to go."
Although he won't be pinned down on areas or regions earmarked for future expansion, Leite says India and Cuba are among the markets the firm
is interested in breaking into in the long term should regulations permit.
In order to stay ahead in the competitive global legal market Leite says you have to look further than just your competitors: "We do not benchmark ourselves against what the other law firms are doing but what other industries are doing, such as consulting, to find innovative ways to serve our clients."
Leite is setting his sights high. "If I have a dream it is for Bakers to be leading the global elite. I'm sure that is what any decent global chairman would dream of."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250