Travers Smith eyes one-third growth in dispute resolution practice
Senior partner Chris Hale outlines ambition for disputes practice revenue to hit £20m by 2020
April 28, 2015 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Travers Smith is aiming to grow its dispute resolution practice by a third over the next three to five years, according to the firm's senior partner, Chris Hale.
The firm is aiming to grow the practice from its current level, where it accounts for 15% of the firm's revenue, to 20% by 2020.
Travers turned over £97.2m in the year to 30 June 2014. The 40-strong, seven-partner disputes practice accounted for around £15m of that revenue.
If Hale's plans come to fruition this will grow closer to £20m by 2020.
Hale said Travers had "traditionally" been focused on transactional work but he wanted to see "balance elsewhere" in the firm.
He added: "You then have to accept that if you are heavily focused on transactional work, you will have seven out of 10 good years but three will be bad. The financial crisis made us rethink whether that was what we wanted to do.
"The hope will be that [dispute resolution] will contribute more in future."
Transactional work currently accounts for around 65% of the firm's total revenue.
Hale said the growth in partners in the dispute resolution practice would be organic, as opposed to making lateral partner hires, in line with the firm's overall strategy of promoting from within.
Several of Travers' current dispute resolution partners joined the firm as associates from magic circle firms.
Hale said the firm would like to continue taking on a limited number of large, high-profile disputes mandates – such as acting on the investigation into the Bank of England's knowledge of foreign exchange market rigging and a £3.4bn dispute between Hewlett-Packard, Autonomy founder Michael Lynch and its former chief financial officer, Sushovan Hussain, over allegations of fraudulent accounting – while combining these with a greater number of smaller disputes.
Hale added: "I'm reluctant to brand us as a mid-market firm. A lot of the work we do is very top-end in both transactions and dispute resolution."
He said there were no targets in place for other practice groups at Travers, though he would like to see the firm take on more financial services regulatory work alongside the growth in disputes work.
Meanwhile, elections for two non-executive positions on the firm's partnership board will take place in the coming months. The non-executives will sit alongside Hale and recently appointed managing partner David Patient.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250