'The devil is in the detail': Gateley senior partner on executing the UK's first law firm float
Senior partner Michael Ward outlines his plans for expansion and acquisition as his firm prepares to go public
May 12, 2015 at 08:03 PM
5 minute read
As much as the traditional partnership model has been disrupted in the last few years, no firm has gone as far as Gateley did yesterday (12 May) by filing its intention to float with the London Stock Exchange.
The filing contains detail on exactly how much of the firm will go to external investors – 49.9% – and how much will be kept in the hands of equity partners – 50.1% – who face a five-year lock-in, during which time some or all of their shares can be taken away if they leave.
Valuing a UK law firm for a listing has no precedent. To this end, broker Cantor Fitzgerald, advised by a Fieldfisher team headed by corporate partner Neil Matthews, attempted to construct a like-for-like peer group as best it could, drawing on professional services firms of a similar size offering some similar services to overlapping clients.
Comparisons with law firms listed elsewhere, including Australia's Slater & Gordon, were also relevant in the valuation but to a lesser extent.
In the end, they came out with a figure in the region of £130m.
The motivation for raising the cash, according to Gateley senior partner Michael Ward, is to fund an expansion drive that could include taking over entire law firms, niche practices, side-line businesses or luring in team hires.
The firm has no specific acquisition targets in mind at this stage, however.
"It will be services close to what we currently provide; for example, a human resources consultancy would sit well with our employment team," explains Ward. "We can look a little further left or right than our existing business model but it would have to stay relevant; we aren't suddenly going to go into accountancy."
We can look a little further left or right than our existing business model but it would have to stay relevant; we aren't suddenly going to go into accountancy
Ward is currently on an investor roadshow to drum up support for his growth mission. He has seen around 30 potential candidates so far, with another 30 in the pipeline. He will not be drawn on names, but is optimistic when it comes to institutional take-up.
"I have been an investor in Gateley for more than 20 years, and it's not let me down yet. I hope like-minded investors will do the same."
But will the sudden appearance of external, institutional investors stop partners retaining real influence over the firm?
"Hopefully not," says Ward. "What we are going to try and do is to run the business as near as possible post-float to the way we ran pre-float. All of the reasons our guys come to work in the morning and deliver quality legal services – we made sure that's all still in our business."
Equity partners will not be able to invest more than their initial allocation of shares, he adds, which will mirror their current share of the equity from day one.
"In terms of moving to salaries as opposed to a share of profits we have addressed that in a way we think works," says Ward. "People are going to get a salary, a bonus and an investment return."
HBJ Gateley, the firm's Scottish trading arm, will not be involved in the float, given that the Scottish rules still prevent law firms from taking up the alternative business structure licences that would allow them to take on external investment.
But, if all goes to plan, the rest of Gateley hopes to complete its listing by the end of the month, with 28 May pencilled in as the launch date. An exact valuation will come in the firm's admission document, which will indicate investor appetite and pricing ahead of the float.
Under stock exchange rules Ward is prevented from disclosing any projections of the firm's revenue or profit to Legal Week. He will also not comment on many of the technical and advisory aspects of executing the float, but for a completely different reason. He is keen to pick up instructions from other law firms should they choose to follow suit and file for an initial public offering.
"We are always open for business and looking for new lines of work," he says. Ward draws an analogy with the firm's mandate on Halliwells' insolvency, the first large UK law firm to go under, which led to several further law firm insolvency mandates for Gateley.
Ward admits that there have been some disappointments along the way to announcing the firm's planned listing on London's AIM exchange, and that deciding to launch a public offering was "not a cheap process". He declines to give specific figures but brokers usually charge up to 5% of the money raised through a float as a fee and fixed costs are around £50,000 on top of that.
"The devil is in the detail," sighs Ward, who can finally see the end of a long road towards the listing. Only one detail will matter to investors in a publicly traded Gateley though: whether the firm can grow fast enough to pay back its shareholders.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Law Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250