Stephenson Harwood drops ex-Leeds United boss case after non-payment of fees
Dubai court declines application to release David Haigh's frozen funds to cover payment of fees and expenses
May 14, 2015 at 06:47 AM
2 minute read
Stephenson Harwood has ceased acting for former Leeds United managing director David Haigh in Dubai after a local court rejected an application for some of Haigh's funds to be released to pay his legal fees.
The firm is owed in excess of £1m in fees for representing Haigh, who is currently imprisoned in Dubai after being accused by Leeds United's former owner, Gulf Finance House (GFH) Capital – where Haigh was previously general counsel – of fraud during GFH's ownership and sale of the club last year.
Stephenson Harwood attempted to have a freezing order on Haigh's assets lifted at a hearing on Tuesday (12 May) in the Dubai International Financial Centre courts so that some of the fees and expenses the firm had incurred to date could be paid, but it was unsuccessful.
Stephenson Harwood commercial litigation partner Rovine Chandrasekera, who led the team representing Haigh, said: "We wished to continue to represent and support David, as we have done for the past year, but unfortunately the court's decision means we will now come off the record."
The firm is understood to have been acting for Haigh on a billable hours basis since access to the ex-Leeds United managing director, who has been in prison in Dubai since May last year, has been limited.
Stephenson Harwood will, however, continue to act for Haigh in a private prosecution in the UK courts that he has brought against former Gibson Dunn & Crutcher partner Peter Gray. The firm is still being supported by lawyers from Olswang on this case.
Gray, who acted for GFH in its Dubai claim against Haigh, is being accused by Haigh of engaging in fraud and conspiracy.
Gray left Gibson Dunn at the start of this month after being found to have deliberately misled the High Court in the UK in an unrelated case.
In March a High Court judge ruled that Gray knowingly submitted incorrectly dated evidence in a case between the Republic of Djibouti and one of its wealthiest citizens, Abdourahman Boreh.
His application to appeal that judgment is still awaiting a decision.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSquire Patton Boggs Associate Dies Following Methanol Poisoning in Laos
1 minute readLinklaters Sees Latest Partner Exit as UK Leveraged Finance Partner Walks To Simpson Thacher
2 minute readEx-Dewey & LeBoeuf Banking Lawyer on Trial in Germany’s Cum-Ex Tax Scandal
Setting Standards: Vanguard Australia's Sean Hughes on Moving From Government Regulator to Corporate General Counsel
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250