A cage of our own making? Lawyers and the 24/7 demands of modern working
My affection for Twitter, combined with my ability to be easily distracted, leads me down many an avenue of intriguing discovery, such as the lawyer in a cage spotted last week at Liverpool Street Station...
May 18, 2015 at 06:48 AM
4 minute read
My affection for Twitter, combined with my ability to be easily distracted, leads me down many an avenue of intriguing discovery, such as the lawyer in a cage spotted last week at Liverpool Street Station (pictured below right). It turns out it was the law firm Keystone Law, which was, to quote the press release, "challenging the norms for legal careers with a call to action".
Being stuck in a cage for three days on the main concourse of the station certainly got plenty of attention, including mine, and was a novel way of making the point that a career in law doesn't have to feel like a prison sentence. As for the call to action, applying to Keystone may be one response, but most of us may be more likely to take stock and reflect, probably only momentarily, whether we are anywhere near getting our work/life balance right.
Talk about work/life balance and concern for lawyers' mental health and wellbeing is nothing new; although in reality, that concern is likely to be confined to other lawyers and their families, rather than the public at large, who hold us in lower esteem than estate agents and who see us all as fat cats.
While it may be true that no-one ever said on their death bed that they wished they'd spent more time in the office, that is rarely an acceptable answer to a demanding client, senior partner, head of chambers or practice manager. Going on holiday does not mean getting away from work but does require you to remember to take your Blackberry (other phones and mobile devices are available) out of your pocket before going in the sea.
Keystone's caged lawyer recruitment stunt occurred a few days after the release of a Bar Council report, Wellbeing at the Bar, which highlighted that 63% of the very large sample were either unable to integrate the things that are most important to their lives and work, or were only able to do so sometimes. In addition, 34% said their workload was unmanageable or only sometimes manageable.
Unsurprisingly, however, 76% did not think that the most important things that happen in life involve work (the other 24% are very sad!) The report also reveals good things about the Bar, but it is quite clear that work/life balance remains dangerously tipped in favour of work.
One of the attractions of the self-employed Bar is the autonomy and independence it can give, but chambers increasingly and understandably have a more corporate approach to legal business (a word that would itself have been anathema to any barrister 25 years ago).
With the corporate-like striving for better work and greater turnover must come greater support and effective measures to ensure that members of chambers are supported in stressful times, together with imaginative and creative maternity, paternity, parental and carer policies to enable members to combine a career, that so many continue to love, with the things and people that are indeed more important in life. That is something that Hardwicke, the chambers of which I am a member, has looked to achieve. Whether we succeed is another matter, but at least we are trying.
So are lawyers trapped in cages? Probably, but for the self-employed Bar some of those cages are of our own individual making. Perhaps we should say no to some work, as we do not have the capacity without harming our health. Perhaps some of us (here's looking at me kid) should spend less time looking at Twitter and then I wouldn't need to be in chambers every day from 7am until at least 8pm… although I might then miss out on an interesting legal story.
PJ Kirby QC is a barrister at Hardwicke – click here to follow PJ on Twitter and click here to follow Keystone Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250